Valérie Laporte
- Genetics top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Deborah CharlesworthBrian CharlesworthDmitry A. FilatovFrançoise MonégerBoris VyskotDominique MouchiroudIoan NegrutiuMichaël Nicolas
- Topics
- Plant Reproductive Biology (5 papers)Genetic diversity and population structure (4 papers)Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomCzechia
In The Last Decade
Valérie Laporte
10 papers receiving 598 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Genetics 419
- Plant Science 289
- Molecular Biology 281
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 252
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 84
Countries citing papers authored by Valérie Laporte
This map shows the geographic impact of Valérie Laporte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Valérie Laporte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Valérie Laporte more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Valérie Laporte
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Valérie Laporte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Valérie Laporte. The network helps show where Valérie Laporte may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Valérie Laporte
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Valérie Laporte. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Valérie Laporte based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Valérie Laporte. Valérie Laporte is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 190 | |
| 2 | 31 | |
| 3 | 125 | |
| 4 | The spatial structure of sexual and cytonuclear polymorphism in the gynodioecious Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima: I/ at a local scale. | 1 |
| 5 | 46 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 54 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 133 |
About Valérie Laporte
Valérie Laporte is a scholar working on Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 616 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Reproductive Biology (5 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (4 papers) and Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (419 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (252 citations) and Plant Science (289 citations). Valérie Laporte has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Deborah Charlesworth, Brian Charlesworth, Dmitry A. Filatov, Françoise Monéger, Boris Vyskot, Dominique Mouchiroud, Ioan Negrutiu, Michaël Nicolas, Gabriel Marais and Bohuslav Janoušek. Their work appears in journals such as Genetics, PLoS Biology and Molecular Biology and Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.