Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of V. Szebehely's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V. Szebehely with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V. Szebehely more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by V. Szebehely. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V. Szebehely. The network helps show where V. Szebehely may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of V. Szebehely
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of V. Szebehely.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of V. Szebehely based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with V. Szebehely. V. Szebehely is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Szebehely, V.. (1989). Adventures in celestial mechanics : a first course in the theory of orbits. University of Texas Press eBooks. 90. 16573.3 indexed citations
3.
Szebehely, V.. (1986). Uncertainties and instabilities in celestial mechanics.. CERN Bulletin. 19(1). 43–47.
4.
Szebehely, V., et al.. (1986). Orbit mechanics of deep space probes. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences. 34. 171–187.1 indexed citations
5.
Taff, L. G. & V. Szebehely. (1986). Book-Review - Celestial Mechanics - a Computational Guide for the Practitioner. 319. 630.1 indexed citations
Horton, C. W., L. E. Reichl, & V. Szebehely. (1983). Long-Time Prediction in Dynamics. Wiley eBooks.125 indexed citations
8.
Markellos, V. V. & V. Szebehely. (1981). Approximations of satellite stability. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy. 24(2). 183–184.1 indexed citations
9.
Szebehely, V.. (1979). Instabilities in dynamical systems. Applications to celestial mechanics. 47.2 indexed citations
10.
Szebehely, V.. (1979). Instabilities in dynamical systems : applications to celestial mechanics : proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute held at Cortina d'Ampezzo, Italy, July 30-August 12, 1978.1 indexed citations
11.
Szebehely, V.. (1979). Stability of inner planetary systems. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik. 30(2). 364–369.2 indexed citations
12.
Jefferys, W. H. & V. Szebehely. (1978). Dynamics and stability of the solar system.. 8(1). 9–17.1 indexed citations
13.
Szebehely, V. & K. Zare. (1976). Stability of Classical Triplets and of Their Hierarchy. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 58. 145–152.44 indexed citations
Tapley, B. D. & V. Szebehely. (1973). Recent advances in dynamical astronomy : proceedings of the NATO advanced study institute in dynamical astronomy held in Cortina d'Ampezzo, Italy, Aug. 9-21, 1972.1 indexed citations
Szebehely, V.. (1969). Theory of Orbits-The Restricted Problem of Three Bodies.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 13. 364.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.