V. Gallot

1.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
28 papers, 613 citations indexed

About

V. Gallot is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, V. Gallot has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 613 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 20 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 7 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in V. Gallot's work include Ovarian function and disorders (19 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (17 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (7 papers). V. Gallot is often cited by papers focused on Ovarian function and disorders (19 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (17 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (7 papers). V. Gallot collaborates with scholars based in France, Brazil and Italy. V. Gallot's co-authors include Elisângela Arbo, Stéphanie Huberlant, Nathalie Sermondade, Marina Colombani, Thomas Fréour, Nelly Frydman, Rénato Fanchin, Michaël Grynberg, Vanessa Krebs Genro and Laëtitia Hesters and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Oncology, Human Reproduction and Fertility and Sterility.

In The Last Decade

V. Gallot

28 papers receiving 597 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Female obesity is negatively associated with live birth rate following IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 245 citations V. Gallot et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
V. Gallot France	12	407	389	246	115	94	28	613
Juan José Espinós Spain	13	354 0.9×	314 0.8×	167 0.7×	126 1.1×	83 0.9×	31	579
Rebecca Usadi United States	17	645 1.6×	436 1.1×	199 0.8×	141 1.2×	163 1.7×	38	846
Sandra García Spain	12	342 0.8×	343 0.9×	207 0.8×	126 1.1×	134 1.4×	37	557
A. Ellenbogen Israel	15	609 1.5×	564 1.4×	309 1.3×	133 1.2×	67 0.7×	49	821
Suleena Kansal Kalra United States	11	637 1.6×	520 1.3×	547 2.2×	179 1.6×	99 1.1×	14	996
Isaac Jacques Kadoch Canada	14	459 1.1×	343 0.9×	302 1.2×	65 0.6×	64 0.7×	39	590
Evangelos Maziotis Greece	16	394 1.0×	344 0.9×	194 0.8×	101 0.9×	179 1.9×	40	664
Jason S. Yeh United States	11	506 1.2×	389 1.0×	427 1.7×	96 0.8×	76 0.8×	24	710
Petroula Tsioulou Greece	12	298 0.7×	255 0.7×	135 0.5×	69 0.6×	83 0.9×	25	481
W. Urdl Austria	11	243 0.6×	333 0.9×	129 0.5×	143 1.2×	89 0.9×	38	598

Countries citing papers authored by V. Gallot

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of V. Gallot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V. Gallot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V. Gallot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by V. Gallot

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by V. Gallot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V. Gallot. The network helps show where V. Gallot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of V. Gallot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of V. Gallot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of V. Gallot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with V. Gallot. V. Gallot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Mayeur, Anne, Michaël Grynberg, Laëtitia Hesters, et al.. (2023). Ovarian tissue cryopreservation can be combined simultaneously with oocyte retrieval after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Human Reproduction. 38(5). 860–871. 5 indexed citations

Mayeur, Anne, Laëtitia Hesters, V. Gallot, et al.. (2021). Live birth rate after use of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos at the time of cancer diagnosis in female survivors: a retrospective study of ten years of experience. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 38(7). 1767–1775. 21 indexed citations

Grynberg, Marcin, et al.. (2020). First birth achieved after fertility preservation using vitrification of in vitro matured oocytes in a woman with breast cancer. Annals of Oncology. 31(4). 541–542. 25 indexed citations

Mayeur, Anne, V. Gallot, Laëtitia Hesters, et al.. (2020). First follow-up of art pregnancies in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 253. 71–75. 9 indexed citations

Fernandez, H., Isabelle Cédrin‐Durnerin, V. Gallot, et al.. (2015). Drilling ovarien par fertiloscopie ou stimulation par FSH plus metformine dans le traitement du syndrome des ovaires polykystiques : pourquoi un essai thérapeutique peut être un échec. Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément. 44(8). 692–698. 2 indexed citations

Gallot, V., P. Capmas, Guillaume Legendre, et al.. (2014). Fausses couches précoces « à répétition » : bilan et prise en charge. Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément. 43(10). 812–841. 8 indexed citations

Delabaere, A., Cyrille Huchon, Vincent Lavoué, et al.. (2014). Standardisation de la terminologie des pertes de grossesse : consensus d’experts du Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CNGOF). Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément. 43(10). 756–763. 25 indexed citations

Nizard, J., G. Guettrot-Imbert, Cécile Ciangura, et al.. (2014). Pathologies maternelles chroniques et pertes de grossesse. Recommandations françaises. Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément. 43(10). 865–882. 14 indexed citations

Huchon, Cyrille, X. Deffieux, G. Beucher, et al.. (2014). Pertes de grossesse : recommandations pour la pratique clinique – Texte court. Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément. 43(10). 918–928. 11 indexed citations

10.

Legendre, Guillaume, V. Gallot, J.‐M. Levaillant, P. Capmas, & H. Fernandez. (2013). Obturation tubaire d’un hydrosalpinx avant fécondation in vitro par Adiana® : à propos d’un cas. Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément. 42(4). 401–404. 5 indexed citations

11.

Gallot, V., et al.. (2012). Antral follicle responsiveness to follicle-stimulating hormone administration assessed by the Follicular Output RaTe (FORT) may predict in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome. Human Reproduction. 27(4). 1066–1072. 77 indexed citations

12.

Grynberg, Michaël, et al.. (2012). Cancer, préservation de la fertilité et gonadotrophines. Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément. 41(6). 512–518. 2 indexed citations

13.

Lamazou, F., F. Fuchs, Michaël Grynberg, et al.. (2011). Annulations en fécondation in vitro : mauvais pronostic, mauvaises répondeuses, ou variabilité de la réponse à la stimulation ? Analyse de 142 annulations. Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément. 41(1). 41–47. 14 indexed citations

14.

Lamazou, F., et al.. (2011). Les stimulations ovariennes modérées pour fécondation in vitro constituent-elles un réel progrès en assistance médicale à la procréation ?. Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément. 41(1). 6–13. 3 indexed citations

15.

Lamazou, F., Vanessa Krebs Genro, F. Fuchs, et al.. (2011). L’AMH sérique n’a pas de valeur prédictive en fécondation in vitro en cycle naturel modifié : analyse de 342 cycles. Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément. 40(3). 205–210. 16 indexed citations

16.

Torre, Antoine, et al.. (2010). Mise au point : traitements anticancéreux et réserve ovarienne. Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément. 39(6). 433–443. 4 indexed citations

17.

Lédée, Nathalie, R Frydman, Julien Taı̈eb, et al.. (2010). Levels of follicular G-CSF and interleukin-15 appear as noninvasive biomarkers of subsequent successful birth in modified natural in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertility and Sterility. 95(1). 94–98. 37 indexed citations

18.

Grynberg, Michaël, et al.. (2010). Hormone antimüllérienne : acteur et marqueur de la folliculogenèse. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 38(7-8). 471–474. 4 indexed citations

19.

Grynberg, Michaël, et al.. (2009). Early follicle development during the luteal-follicular transition affects the predictability of serum follicle-stimulating hormone but not antimüllerian hormone levels on cycle day 3. Fertility and Sterility. 94(5). 1827–1831. 5 indexed citations

20.

Fanchin, Rénato, V. Gallot, Nathalie Rouas‐Freiss, René Frydman, & Edgardo D. Carosella. (2007). Implication of HLA-G in Human Embryo Implantation. Human Immunology. 68(4). 259–263. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact