Utkarsh Agrawal
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Condensed Matter Physics top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Co-authors
- Romain VasseurSarang GopalakrishnanAndrew C. PotterWolfgang BelzigAkashdeep KamraJ. H. PixleyAidan ZabaloJustin H. Wilson
- Topics
- Quantum many-body systems (9 papers)Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (4 papers)Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Computational MathematicsAtomic and Molecular Physics, and OpticsStatistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaIndia
In The Last Decade
Utkarsh Agrawal
10 papers receiving 333 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 311
- Artificial Intelligence 146
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 84
- Condensed Matter Physics 70
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 12
Countries citing papers authored by Utkarsh Agrawal
This map shows the geographic impact of Utkarsh Agrawal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Utkarsh Agrawal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Utkarsh Agrawal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Utkarsh Agrawal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Utkarsh Agrawal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Utkarsh Agrawal. The network helps show where Utkarsh Agrawal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Utkarsh Agrawal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Utkarsh Agrawal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Utkarsh Agrawal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Utkarsh Agrawal. Utkarsh Agrawal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 28 | |
| 3 | 93 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 63 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 45 |
About Utkarsh Agrawal
Utkarsh Agrawal is a scholar working on Computational Mathematics, Condensed Matter Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum many-body systems (9 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (4 papers) and Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (7 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (311 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (84 citations). Utkarsh Agrawal has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and India. Frequent co-authors include Romain Vasseur, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, Andrew C. Potter, Wolfgang Belzig, Akashdeep Kamra, J. H. Pixley, Aidan Zabalo, Justin H. Wilson, Kun Chen and David A. Huse. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B. and Physical Review X.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.