Ute Schmidt

1.2k citations
40 papers · 932 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Ute Schmidt

38 papers receiving 906 citations

Peers

Ute Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Inorganic Chemistry 319
  • Electrochemistry 100
  • Organic Chemistry 422
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 21
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 159
Replace Peter B. Wells with:
Peter B. Wells United Kingdom
Céline Dablemont France
Pradip Kr. Ghorai India
David B. Beach United States
Alan D. Berry United States
David C. Boyd United States
Axel Kahnt Germany
Aloysius F. Hepp United States
Arántzazu González‐Campo Spain
Akihiko Ouchi Japan
Ute Schmidt relative to Peter B. Wells United Kingdom Peter B. Wells's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Peter B. Wells · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ute Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ute Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ute Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ute Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ute Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ute Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ute Schmidt. The network helps show where Ute Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ute Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ute Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Ute Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199385
2 199876
3 200267
4 199664
5 199863
6 199860
7 201358
8 199644
9 200135
10 199234
11 199230
12 199627
13 201027
14 199922
15 199822
16 199221
17 199720
18 201918
19 199818
20 200218

About Ute Schmidt

Ute Schmidt is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 40 papers that have together received 932 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (18 papers), Organophosphorus compounds synthesis (10 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (8 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (6 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (6 papers), Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (5 papers), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (3 papers) and Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (319 citations), Electrochemistry (100 citations), Organic Chemistry (422 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (21 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (159 citations). Ute Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Bulgaria and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include G. Oehme, Christine Fischer, G. Staikov, Armin Börner, Ingrid Grassert, H. W. Krause, Detlef Heller, Stefan Zschoche, Carsten Werner and Jens Holz. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Asymmetry, Chirality, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, European Journal of Organic Chemistry and Chemical Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact