Ute Moog

8.2k citations
95 papers · 2.6k indexed · h-index 29

Ute Moog

93 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Ute Moog
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Genetics 1.7k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 443
  • Molecular Biology 1.3k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 257
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 199
Replace Bregje W.M. van Bon with:
Bregje W.M. van Bon Netherlands
Damien Sanlaville France
Karen Brøndum‐Nielsen Denmark
Christiane Zweier Germany
Meredith Wilson Australia
Cynthia M. Powell United States
Bronwyn Kerr United Kingdom
Marjolein H. Willemsen Netherlands
Eli Hatchwell United States
Roberto Giorda Italy
Ute Moog relative to Bregje W.M. van Bon Netherlands Bregje W.M. van Bon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Bregje W.M. van Bon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ute Moog

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ute Moog's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ute Moog with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ute Moog more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ute Moog

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ute Moog. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ute Moog. The network helps show where Ute Moog may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ute Moog, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ute Moog Line = papers co-authored together Ute Moog links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202026
2 201914
3 201734
4 20167
5 201429
6 20144
7 201411
8 201335
9 200758
10 200732
11 200618
12 200514
13 200522
14 200447
15 200457
16 200229
17
Holoprosencephaly: the Maastricht experience.
200123
18 200118
19 200010
20
Clinical features in patients with duplications of chromosome 18
19961

About Ute Moog

Ute Moog is a scholar working on Genetics, Developmental Biology, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Cell Biology, having authored 95 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (27 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (23 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (12 papers), Genetic and rare skin diseases. (11 papers), Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (10 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (9 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (8 papers) and RNA regulation and disease (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (1.7k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (443 citations), Molecular Biology (1.3k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (257 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (199 citations). Ute Moog has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Hartmut Engels, Mariëlle S. van Roosmalen, W.A.J. van Daal, Gudrun Rappold, Peep F. M. Stalmeier, Lia C.G. Verhoef, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge, Jan C. Oosterwijk, Josette E. H. M. Hoekstra‐Weebers and Michael Bonin. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Genetics, European Journal of Human Genetics, Journal of Medical Genetics, Familial Cancer and American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026