Ursula Kriebaum

16 papers receiving 81 citations

Peers

Ursula Kriebaum
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Strategy and Management 82
  • Political Science and International Relations 61
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 50
  • Sociology and Political Science 12
  • Law 10
Replace Andrea K. Bjorklund with:
Andrea K. Bjorklund Canada
Patrick Dumberry Canada
Mārtiņš Paparinskis United Kingdom
Loretta Malintoppi Austria
Charles N. Brower United States
Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler Switzerland
Anthony Sinclair Austria
Freya Baetens Netherlands
Wenhua Shan China
Eric De Brabandere Hungary
Ursula Kriebaum relative to Andrea K. Bjorklund Canada Andrea K. Bjorklund's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Andrea K. Bjorklund · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ursula Kriebaum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ursula Kriebaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ursula Kriebaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ursula Kriebaum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ursula Kriebaum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ursula Kriebaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ursula Kriebaum. The network helps show where Ursula Kriebaum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ursula Kriebaum

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ursula Kriebaum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ursula Kriebaum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ursula Kriebaum. Ursula Kriebaum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 8
2 0
3 5
4 3
5 5
6
FET and Expropriation in the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement between the European Union and Canada (CETA)
5
7 4
8 3
9 1
10 10
11
Arbitrary/Unreasonable or Discriminatory Measures
1
12
At What Time Must Legitimate Expectations Exist
8
13 0
14 2
15 6
16 4
17
The law of international relations : liber amicorum Hanspeter Neuhold
11
18 20
19 7
20 1

About Ursula Kriebaum

Ursula Kriebaum is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Political Science and International Relations and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 21 papers that have together received 107 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Arbitration and Investment Law (15 papers), International Law and Human Rights (7 papers) and Corporate Law and Human Rights (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (82 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (50 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (61 citations). Ursula Kriebaum has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christoph H. Schreuer, August Reinisch, Rudolf Dolzer, Wolfgang Alschner, Friedl Weiss, Freya Baetens, Diane A. Desierto, Gleider Hernández, Moshe Hirsch and Markus W. Gehring. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of World Investment & Trade, ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal and The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026