Urška Šadl
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Law top 2%
- Strategy and Management
- Economics and Econometrics
- Sociology and Political Science
- Topics
- European and International Law Studies (23 papers)European Union Policy and Governance (7 papers)Judicial and Constitutional Studies (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJCMS Journal of Common Market StudiesThe American Journal of Comparative Law
In The Last Decade
Urška Šadl
24 papers receiving 100 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Political Science and International Relations 78
- Law 53
- Strategy and Management 23
- Economics and Econometrics 19
- Sociology and Political Science 11
Countries citing papers authored by Urška Šadl
This map shows the geographic impact of Urška Šadl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Urška Šadl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Urška Šadl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Urška Šadl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Urška Šadl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Urška Šadl. The network helps show where Urška Šadl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Urška Šadl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Urška Šadl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Urška Šadl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Urška Šadl. Urška Šadl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | The Preliminaries of a Reference | 2 |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | What is a leading Case in EU Law?. An empirical snalysis | 1 |
| 17 | The role of effet utile in preserving the continuity and authority of European Union law : evidence from the citation web of the pre-accession case law of the court of justice of the EU | 7 |
| 18 | What is a Leading Case in EU law? An empirical analysis | 0 |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Urška Šadl
Urška Šadl is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Law and Strategy and Management, having authored 28 papers that have together received 112 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European and International Law Studies (23 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (7 papers) and Judicial and Constitutional Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (53 citations), Political Science and International Relations (78 citations) and Strategy and Management (23 citations). Urška Šadl has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Henrik Palmer Olsen, Mikael Rask Madsen, Lee Epstein, Daniel Naurin, Mikael Rask Madsen, Graham Butler and Yannis Panagis. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies and The American Journal of Comparative Law.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.