Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Top quark mass in supersymmetric SO(10) unification
1994543 citationsLawrence J. Hall, Riccardo Rattazzi et al.Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fieldsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Uri Sarid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Uri Sarid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Uri Sarid more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Uri Sarid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Uri Sarid. The network helps show where Uri Sarid may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Uri Sarid
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Uri Sarid.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Uri Sarid based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Uri Sarid. Uri Sarid is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Sarid, Uri & Scott Thomas. (2000). Mesino-Antimesino Oscillations. Physical Review Letters. 85(6). 1178–1181.22 indexed citations
2.
Sarid, Uri. (1998). Tools for tunneling from metastable vacua. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 58(8).19 indexed citations
3.
Gabrielli, Emidio & Uri Sarid. (1998). Imminent phenomenology of a minimal gauge-mediated model. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 58(11).13 indexed citations
Hall, Lawrence J., Riccardo Rattazzi, & Uri Sarid. (1994). Top quark mass in supersymmetric SO(10) unification. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 50(11). 7048–7065.543 indexed citations breakdown →
Giveon, Amit, Lawrence J. Hall, & Uri Sarid. (1991). SU (5) unification revisited. Physics Letters B. 271(1-2). 138–144.73 indexed citations
13.
Carlson, Eric D., et al.. (1991). Cornering color SU(5). Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 44(5). 1555–1568.7 indexed citations
14.
Glashow, Sheldon L. & Uri Sarid. (1990). Addendum to ‘‘Seeking signs of a secondZ’’. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 42(9). 3224–3225.4 indexed citations
15.
Rújula, A. De, Sheldon L. Glashow, & Uri Sarid. (1990). Charged dark matter. Nuclear Physics B. 333(1). 173–194.139 indexed citations
16.
Glashow, Sheldon L. & Uri Sarid. (1990). Seeking signs of a secondZ. Physical Review Letters. 64(7). 725–728.19 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.