Ulrike Sack
Impact in
Papers in
-
- Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy 3
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment 2
- Oncology 5
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Ulrike Stein (9 shared papers)Wolfgang Walther (4 shared papers)Iduna Fichtner (4 shared papers)Robert H. Shoemaker (3 shared papers)Thomas G. Sommermann (3 shared papers)Margit Lemm (3 shared papers)Klaus Rajewsky (3 shared papers)Van Trung Chu (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Current Pharmaceutical Design (3 papers)Oncotarget (1 paper)Molecular Biology of the Cell (1 paper)Biochemical Journal (1 paper)JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ulrike Sack
14 papers receiving 767 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Aging 17
- Cancer Research 110
- Molecular Biology 531
- Oncology 175
- Immunology 110
Countries citing papers authored by Ulrike Sack
This map shows the geographic impact of Ulrike Sack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulrike Sack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulrike Sack more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ulrike Sack
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulrike Sack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulrike Sack. The network helps show where Ulrike Sack may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ulrike Sack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 242 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 179 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 104 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 80 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 46 | |
| 6 | Wnt up your mind - intervention strategies for S100A4-induced metastasis in colon cancer. | 2009 | 23 |
| 7 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 1 |
About Ulrike Sack
Ulrike Sack is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Hepatology, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 780 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include S100 Proteins and Annexins (5 papers), Cancer-related gene regulation (4 papers), Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (3 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (2 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (2 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (17 citations), Cancer Research (110 citations), Molecular Biology (531 citations), Oncology (175 citations) and Immunology (110 citations). Ulrike Sack has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ulrike Stein, Wolfgang Walther, Iduna Fichtner, Robert H. Shoemaker, Thomas G. Sommermann, Margit Lemm, Klaus Rajewsky, Van Trung Chu, Timm Weber and Dominic A. Scudiero. Their work appears in journals such as Current Pharmaceutical Design, Oncotarget, Molecular Biology of the Cell, Biochemical Journal and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.