Ulrike Felt

3.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
63 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Ulrike Felt is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Ulrike Felt has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 9 papers in Information Systems and Management and 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Ulrike Felt's work include Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (8 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (6 papers) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (6 papers). Ulrike Felt is often cited by papers focused on Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (8 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (6 papers) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (6 papers). Ulrike Felt collaborates with scholars based in Austria, Ethiopia and Netherlands. Ulrike Felt's co-authors include Maximilian Fochler, Ruth Müller, Thomas Völker, Judith Igelsböck, Loet Leydesdorff, Michael Penkler, Helga Nowotny, Johannes Starkbaum, Brian Wynne and Andy Stirling and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Physics Today and Journal of Environmental Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Ulrike Felt

58 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously 2009 2026 2014 2020 2009 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ulrike Felt Austria 20 616 297 196 195 153 63 1.6k
Laurens K. Hessels Netherlands 16 338 0.5× 242 0.8× 364 1.9× 294 1.5× 139 0.9× 37 1.6k
Catherine Lyall United Kingdom 19 327 0.5× 285 1.0× 215 1.1× 475 2.4× 142 0.9× 51 1.3k
James Wilsdon United Kingdom 21 955 1.6× 372 1.3× 216 1.1× 255 1.3× 182 1.2× 52 2.9k
Sarah R. Davies Denmark 26 1.0k 1.6× 193 0.6× 92 0.5× 122 0.6× 135 0.9× 66 1.9k
Fletcher Linder United States 5 856 1.4× 407 1.4× 399 2.0× 293 1.5× 366 2.4× 7 2.7k
Gerald E. Markle United States 15 821 1.3× 228 0.8× 103 0.5× 110 0.6× 169 1.1× 42 2.1k
Brian Rappert United Kingdom 15 437 0.7× 111 0.4× 191 1.0× 82 0.4× 75 0.5× 96 1.4k
Erik Fisher United States 20 497 0.8× 294 1.0× 281 1.4× 210 1.1× 74 0.5× 65 1.4k
Maximilian Fochler Austria 13 290 0.5× 102 0.3× 100 0.5× 92 0.5× 93 0.6× 24 753
Kelly Moore United States 12 861 1.4× 127 0.4× 49 0.3× 153 0.8× 73 0.5× 26 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Ulrike Felt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ulrike Felt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulrike Felt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulrike Felt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ulrike Felt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulrike Felt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulrike Felt. The network helps show where Ulrike Felt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ulrike Felt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ulrike Felt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ulrike Felt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ulrike Felt. Ulrike Felt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Felt, Ulrike, et al.. (2025). When Digital Health Encounters Regulation. Science & Technology Studies.
2.
Felt, Ulrike, et al.. (2025). Microplastics in food and drink: Predictors of public risk perceptions and support for plastic-reducing policies based on a climate change framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 103. 102583–102583. 1 indexed citations
3.
Felt, Ulrike, et al.. (2025). On the environmental fragilities of digital solutionism. Articulating ‘digital’ and ‘green’ in the EU’s ‘twin transition’. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. 28(1). 39–57. 2 indexed citations
4.
Felt, Ulrike, et al.. (2025). Collateral transitions. Reassembling societies, data centres and the twin transition. Environmental Science & Policy. 170. 104122–104122.
5.
Felt, Ulrike, et al.. (2024). Infrastructuring citizenry in Smart City Vienna: investigating participatory smartification between policy and practice. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 11(1). 3 indexed citations
6.
Felt, Ulrike, et al.. (2023). Doing co-creation: power and critique in the development of a European health data infrastructure. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 10(1). 8 indexed citations
7.
Felt, Ulrike, et al.. (2022). RESPONSE_ABILITY A Card-Based Engagement Method to Support Researchers’ Ability to Respond to Integrity Issues. Science and Engineering Ethics. 28(2). 14–14. 3 indexed citations
8.
Felt, Ulrike. (2022). Transitions, Expansions, Engagements: Science, Technology, & Human Values between 2002 and 2007. Science Technology & Human Values. 47(4). 650–655. 2 indexed citations
9.
Vogl, Christian R., et al.. (2021). Farmers and scientists in AR4D: Looking at a watershed management project through an STS lens. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research). 93(1). 126–151. 2 indexed citations
10.
Felt, Ulrike & Sarah R. Davies. (2020). Exploring Science Communication: A Science and Technology Studies Approach. 11 indexed citations
11.
Felt, Ulrike, et al.. (2020). “I am Primarily Paid for Publishing…”: The Narrative Framing of Societal Responsibilities in Academic Life Science Research. Science and Engineering Ethics. 26(3). 1569–1593. 19 indexed citations
12.
Felt, Ulrike, et al.. (2018). Reordering the “World of Things”: The Sociotechnical Imaginary of RFID Tagging and New Geographies of Responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics. 25(5). 1425–1446. 6 indexed citations
13.
14.
Felt, Ulrike, et al.. (2016). Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice. Science Technology & Human Values. 41(4). 732–761. 105 indexed citations
15.
Felt, Ulrike, et al.. (2014). Timescapes of obesity: Coming to terms with a complex socio-medical phenomenon. Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine. 18(6). 646–664. 14 indexed citations
16.
Felt, Ulrike & Maximilian Fochler. (2011). Slim Futures and the Fat Pill: Civic Imaginations of Innovation and Governance in an Engagement Setting. Science as Culture. 20(3). 307–328. 6 indexed citations
17.
Felt, Ulrike, et al.. (2009). Shaping the future e-patient: The citizen-patient in public discourse on e-health. Science & Technology Studies. 28(1). 4 indexed citations
18.
Felt, Ulrike. (2008). Gestaltungsversuche des Verhältnisses von Naturwissenschaften und Gesellschaft. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 37. 32–42. 1 indexed citations
19.
Felt, Ulrike & Maximilian Fochler. (2008). The bottom-up meanings of the concept of public participation in science and technology. Science and Public Policy. 35(7). 489–499. 91 indexed citations
20.
Felt, Ulrike, et al.. (2007). Science and Governance: taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Figshare. 88(12). 1454–6. 53 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026