Ulrike Felt
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 2%
- Information Systems and Management top 2%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Co-authors
- Maximilian FochlerRuth MüllerThomas VölkerJudith IgelsböckLoet LeydesdorffMichael PenklerHelga NowotnyJohannes Starkbaum
- Topics
- Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (8 papers)Ethics in Clinical Research (6 papers)Climate Change Communication and Perception (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Information Systems and ManagementManagement of Technology and InnovationStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPhysics TodayJournal of Environmental Psychology
- Partner nations
- AustriaEthiopiaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Ulrike Felt
58 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
- Sociology and Political Science 616
- Global and Planetary Change 297
- Management of Technology and Innovation 196
- Information Systems and Management 195
- General Health Professions 153
Countries citing papers authored by Ulrike Felt
This map shows the geographic impact of Ulrike Felt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulrike Felt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulrike Felt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ulrike Felt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulrike Felt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulrike Felt. The network helps show where Ulrike Felt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ulrike Felt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ulrike Felt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ulrike Felt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ulrike Felt. Ulrike Felt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 132 | |
| 14 | 105 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | Shaping the future e-patient: The citizen-patient in public discourse on e-health | 4 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 91 | |
| 20 | 53 |
About Ulrike Felt
Ulrike Felt is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (8 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (6 papers) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (195 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (196 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (115 citations). Ulrike Felt has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Ethiopia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Maximilian Fochler, Ruth Müller, Thomas Völker, Judith Igelsböck, Loet Leydesdorff, Michael Penkler, Helga Nowotny, Johannes Starkbaum, Brian Wynne and Andy Stirling. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Physics Today and Journal of Environmental Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.