Ulrike Albrecht
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Biomedical Engineering
- Education
- Co-authors
- P. LeǐdererSabine M. GrüsserChantal MörsenKlaus WölflingP. LeidererE. DuvenHerta FlorRalf Thalemann
- Topics
- Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (7 papers)Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (4 papers)Gambling Behavior and Treatments (4 papers)
In The Last Decade
Ulrike Albrecht
17 papers receiving 358 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 154
- Clinical Psychology 113
- Sociology and Political Science 89
- Biomedical Engineering 49
- Education 41
Countries citing papers authored by Ulrike Albrecht
This map shows the geographic impact of Ulrike Albrecht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulrike Albrecht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulrike Albrecht more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ulrike Albrecht
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulrike Albrecht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulrike Albrecht. The network helps show where Ulrike Albrecht may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ulrike Albrecht
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ulrike Albrecht. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ulrike Albrecht based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ulrike Albrecht. Ulrike Albrecht is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 57 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | Diagnostic instruments for behavioural addiction: an overview. | 47 |
| 4 | Exzessive Computernutzung im Kindesalter: Ergebnisse einer psychometrischen Erhebung | 32 |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Atlas zur Verkehrsgeschichte Schleswig-Holsteins im 19. Jahrhundert | 0 |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 48 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 54 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | [A simple method of tearing micrographs in order to produce large dimensioned photomontages of light and electron microscopical pictures (author's transl)]. | 4 |
About Ulrike Albrecht
Ulrike Albrecht is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation, having authored 18 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (7 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (4 papers) and Gambling Behavior and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (10 citations), Clinical Psychology (113 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (154 citations). Ulrike Albrecht has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include P. Leǐderer, Sabine M. Grüsser, Chantal Mörsen, Klaus Wölfling, P. Leiderer, E. Duven, Herta Flor, Ralf Thalemann, R. Möller and J. Boneberg. Their work appears in journals such as Europhysics Letters (EPL), Biological Psychology and Physica B Condensed Matter.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.