Ulrika Landry
About
In The Last Decade
Ulrika Landry
8 papers receiving 717 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Epidemiology 325
- Clinical Psychology 197
- Neurology 193
- General Health Professions 168
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 154
Countries citing papers authored by Ulrika Landry
This map shows the geographic impact of Ulrika Landry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulrika Landry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulrika Landry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ulrika Landry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulrika Landry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulrika Landry. The network helps show where Ulrika Landry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ulrika Landry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ulrika Landry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ulrika Landry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ulrika Landry. Ulrika Landry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 332 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 177 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 47 | |
| 7 | 176 | |
| 8 | 7 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.