Ulrich Stachow

1.5k total citations
24 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Ulrich Stachow is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Ulrich Stachow has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 8 papers in Ecology and 8 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Ulrich Stachow's work include Land Use and Ecosystem Services (7 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (5 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers). Ulrich Stachow is often cited by papers focused on Land Use and Ecosystem Services (7 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (5 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers). Ulrich Stachow collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Italy. Ulrich Stachow's co-authors include David Pimentel, Dávid Takács, Michael Glemnitz, Hubert Wiggering, Peter Zander, Katharina Helming, Alfred Schultz, Klaus Müller, Frieder Graef and Moritz Reckling and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, BioScience and Journal of Environmental Management.

In The Last Decade

Ulrich Stachow

23 papers receiving 968 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ulrich Stachow Germany 12 449 290 222 201 167 24 1.1k
Simoneta Negrete‐Yankelevich Mexico 13 506 1.1× 208 0.7× 225 1.0× 144 0.7× 98 0.6× 33 973
R.W. Verburg Netherlands 20 530 1.2× 256 0.9× 219 1.0× 357 1.8× 214 1.3× 53 1.2k
Malvika Onial United Kingdom 5 659 1.5× 417 1.4× 163 0.7× 287 1.4× 180 1.1× 5 1.2k
Carmel Ramwell United Kingdom 13 382 0.9× 383 1.3× 343 1.5× 397 2.0× 258 1.5× 22 1.4k
Satoru Okubo Japan 18 534 1.2× 263 0.9× 261 1.2× 374 1.9× 210 1.3× 45 1.1k
Michael Glemnitz Germany 15 346 0.8× 210 0.7× 189 0.9× 110 0.5× 114 0.7× 47 833
Dirk Wascher United States 8 672 1.5× 304 1.0× 138 0.6× 236 1.2× 118 0.7× 20 1.1k
Sasha Alexander Australia 8 507 1.1× 270 0.9× 120 0.5× 200 1.0× 126 0.8× 10 991
W. Geertsema Netherlands 8 504 1.1× 242 0.8× 178 0.8× 341 1.7× 165 1.0× 17 944
Pedro Laterra Argentina 19 471 1.0× 337 1.2× 190 0.9× 288 1.4× 159 1.0× 46 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Ulrich Stachow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ulrich Stachow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulrich Stachow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulrich Stachow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ulrich Stachow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulrich Stachow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulrich Stachow. The network helps show where Ulrich Stachow may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ulrich Stachow

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ulrich Stachow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ulrich Stachow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ulrich Stachow. Ulrich Stachow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
König, Hannes, et al.. (2022). UNESCO biosphere reserves show demand for multifunctional agriculture. Journal of Environmental Management. 320. 115790–115790. 3 indexed citations
2.
Sattler, Claudia, et al.. (2022). An analytical framework to link governance, agricultural production practices, and the provision of ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. Ecosystem Services. 53. 101402–101402. 13 indexed citations
3.
4.
Stachow, Ulrich, et al.. (2017). Landnutzung in den Entwicklungszonen der Biosphärenreservate mit Fallbeispielen aus den Brandenburger Biosphärenreservaten. 0028-0615. 92(12). 548–562. 1 indexed citations
5.
Reckling, Moritz, et al.. (2017). Supporting Agricultural Ecosystem Services through the Integration of Perennial Polycultures into Crop Rotations. Sustainability. 9(12). 2267–2267. 52 indexed citations
6.
Glemnitz, Michael, et al.. (2017). Assessing the habitat suitability of agricultural landscapes for characteristic breeding bird guilds using landscape metrics. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 189(4). 166–166. 27 indexed citations
7.
Matthé, Maximilian, Marco Sannolo, Annemarieke Spitzen–van der Sluijs, et al.. (2017). Comparison of photo‐matching algorithms commonly used for photographic capture–recapture studies. Ecology and Evolution. 7(15). 5861–5872. 37 indexed citations
8.
Stachow, Ulrich, et al.. (2015). Moving Window Abundance – A method to characterise the abundance dynamics of farmland birds: The example of Skylark (Alauda arvensis). Ecological Indicators. 60. 317–328. 19 indexed citations
9.
Glemnitz, Michael, Peter Zander, & Ulrich Stachow. (2015). Regionalizing land use impacts on farmland birds. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 187(6). 336–336. 10 indexed citations
10.
Helming, Katharina, Dagmar Balla, Ralf Dannowski, et al.. (2014). Agricultural land use changes – a scenario-based sustainability impact assessment for Brandenburg, Germany. Ecological Indicators. 48. 505–517. 127 indexed citations
11.
Stachow, Ulrich, et al.. (2013). Consequences of isolation distances on the allocation of GM maize fields in agricultural landscapes of Germany. Environmental Sciences Europe. 25(1). 3 indexed citations
12.
13.
Sattler, Claudia, Ulrich Stachow, & Gert Berger. (2011). Expert knowledge-based assessment of farming practices for different biotic indicators using fuzzy logic. Journal of Environmental Management. 95(1). 132–143. 11 indexed citations
14.
Graef, Frieder, et al.. (2006). Agricultural practice changes with cultivating genetically modified herbicide-tolerant oilseed rape. Agricultural Systems. 94(2). 111–118. 25 indexed citations
15.
Wiggering, Hubert, Michael Glemnitz, Katharina Helming, et al.. (2005). Indicators for multifunctional land use—Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials. Ecological Indicators. 6(1). 238–249. 233 indexed citations
16.
Graef, Frieder, et al.. (2005). Methodological scheme for designing the monitoring of genetically modified crops at the regional scale. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 111(1-3). 1–26. 25 indexed citations
17.
Graef, Frieder, G. Schmidt, Winfried Schröder, & Ulrich Stachow. (2005). Determining Ecoregions for Environmental and GMO Monitoring Networks. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 108(1-3). 189–203. 23 indexed citations
18.
Glemnitz, Michael, Harald Kächele, Wilfried Mirschel, et al.. (1998). Impacts of the European Union reform policy after 1996 in north-east Germany: landscape change and wildlife conservation.. 217–230. 1 indexed citations
19.
Pimentel, David, et al.. (1992). Conserving Biological Diversity in Agricultural/Forestry Systems. BioScience. 42(5). 354–362. 448 indexed citations
20.
Stachow, Ulrich, et al.. (1987). Aktivitäten von Laufkäfern (Carabidae Col.) in einem intensiv wirtschaftenden Ackerbaubetrieb–Ein Beitrag zur Agrarökosystemanalyse. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 159(2). 131–145. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Simoneta Negrete‐Yankelevich Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R.W. Verburg Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Malvika Onial Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carmel Ramwell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Satoru Okubo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michael Glemnitz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dirk Wascher Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sasha Alexander Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by W. Geertsema Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Pedro Laterra
Rankless by CCL
2026