U. Deichert

882 total citations
31 papers, 488 citations indexed

About

U. Deichert is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, U. Deichert has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 488 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 10 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 4 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in U. Deichert's work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (12 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (10 papers) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (6 papers). U. Deichert is often cited by papers focused on Uterine Myomas and Treatments (12 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (10 papers) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (6 papers). U. Deichert collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Belgium. U. Deichert's co-authors include Reinhard Schlief, Jörn Bullerdiek, Sabine Bartnitzke, Sylke Wanschura, Yvonne Hennig, E. Daume, Brita Thode, Dominique Nadine Markowski, Bernhard-Joachim Hackelöer and Piere Rogalla and has published in prestigious journals such as Radiology, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Human Reproduction.

In The Last Decade

U. Deichert

30 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
U. Deichert Germany 13 301 250 68 66 54 31 488
Beata Śpiewankiewicz Poland 10 176 0.6× 166 0.7× 118 1.7× 40 0.6× 70 1.3× 39 395
Ram Dgani Israel 12 243 0.8× 223 0.9× 36 0.5× 80 1.2× 39 0.7× 25 478
K Pavelka United States 7 145 0.5× 98 0.4× 89 1.3× 66 1.0× 41 0.8× 12 382
Fatemeh Ghaemmaghami Iran 15 131 0.4× 198 0.8× 38 0.6× 136 2.1× 41 0.8× 41 564
Mamoru Oikawa Japan 7 509 1.7× 313 1.3× 84 1.2× 73 1.1× 29 0.5× 9 753
Ian Harley United Kingdom 13 243 0.8× 214 0.9× 64 0.9× 27 0.4× 60 1.1× 23 506
Diana Lim Singapore 11 211 0.7× 234 0.9× 77 1.1× 13 0.2× 40 0.7× 30 415
M. Payson United States 15 334 1.1× 470 1.9× 75 1.1× 207 3.1× 13 0.2× 25 703
Elisabet Björkholm Sweden 9 108 0.4× 263 1.1× 62 0.9× 52 0.8× 26 0.5× 10 387
Kari Høeg Norway 11 148 0.5× 334 1.3× 41 0.6× 51 0.8× 101 1.9× 27 548

Countries citing papers authored by U. Deichert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of U. Deichert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by U. Deichert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U. Deichert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by U. Deichert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by U. Deichert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by U. Deichert. The network helps show where U. Deichert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of U. Deichert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of U. Deichert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of U. Deichert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with U. Deichert. U. Deichert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ohlinger, Ralf, Stefan Paepke, Jens‐Uwe Blohmer, et al.. (2020). Correlation of Ductoscopic and Histopathological Findings and Their Relevance as Predictors for Malignancy: A German Multicenter Study. Anticancer Research. 40(4). 2185–2190. 3 indexed citations
2.
Ohlinger, Ralf, Stefan Paepke, Jens‐Uwe Blohmer, et al.. (2014). Ductoscopic Detection of Intraductal Lesions in Cases of Pathologic Nipple Discharge in Comparison with Standard Diagnostics: The German Multicenter Study. Oncology Research and Treatment. 37(11). 628–632. 20 indexed citations
3.
Hennig, Yvonne, Piere Rogalla, Sylke Wanschura, et al.. (1997). HMGIC Expressed in a Uterine Leiomyoma with a Deletion of the Long Arm of Chromosome 7 Along with a 12q14–15 Rearrangement But Not in Tumors Showing del(7) as the Sole Cytogenetic Abnormality. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics. 96(2). 129–133. 36 indexed citations
4.
Hennig, Yvonne, U. Deichert, Brita Thode, et al.. (1996). Structural aberrations of chromosome 6 in three uterine smooth muscle tumors. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics. 87(2). 148–151. 6 indexed citations
5.
6.
Hennig, Yvonne, Sylke Wanschura, U. Deichert, Sabine Bartnitzke, & Jörn Bullerdiek. (1996). Diagnosing and preventing inheirted disease. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2(4). 277–283. 34 indexed citations
7.
Wanschura, Sylke, et al.. (1996). An endometrial polyp with a rearrangement of HMGI-C underlying a complex cytogenetic rearrangement involving chromosomes 2 and 12. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics. 90(1). 88–90. 36 indexed citations
8.
Rogalla, P., et al.. (1995). Telomere Repeat Fragment Sizes Do Not Limit the Growth Potential of Uterine Leiomyomas. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 211(1). 175–182. 25 indexed citations
9.
Wanschura, Sylke, Yvonne Hennig, U. Deichert, et al.. (1995). Molecular-cytogenetic refinement of the 12q14→q15 breakpoint region affected in uterine leiomyomas. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 71(2). 131–135. 6 indexed citations
10.
Köhl, H., et al.. (1992). The clinical significance of antisperm antibodies in infertile couples*. Human Reproduction. 7(10). 1384–1387. 12 indexed citations
11.
Deichert, U., et al.. (1992). Eine zytogenetische Subtypisierung von 139 Uterus-Leiomyomen. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 52(12). 767–772. 18 indexed citations
12.
Hackenberg, Reinhard, et al.. (1992). The response of uterine fibroids to GnRH-agonist treatment can be predicted in most cases after one month. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 45(2). 125–129. 11 indexed citations
13.
14.
Deichert, U., et al.. (1991). Keimstrang-Stroma-Tumor mit annulären Tubuli bei einer Sterilitätspatientin. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 51(2). 150–153. 2 indexed citations
15.
Schlief, Reinhard & U. Deichert. (1991). Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography of the uterus and fallopian tubes: results of a clinical trial of a new contrast medium in 120 patients.. Radiology. 178(1). 213–215. 67 indexed citations
16.
Deichert, U., et al.. (1990). Transvaginale Hysterosalpingo-Kontrastsonographie (HKSG) im B-Bild-Verfahren und in der farbcodierten Duplexsonographie zur Abklärung der Tubenpassage. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 50(9). 717–721. 8 indexed citations
17.
Deichert, U., et al.. (1990). Präoperative Reduktion von Uterusmyomen durch das GnRH-Analogon Goserelin (Zoladex®). Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 50(2). 136–139. 6 indexed citations
18.
Deichert, U., et al.. (1989). Transvaginal hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography (Hy-Co-Sy) compared with conventional tubal diagnostics. Human Reproduction. 4(4). 418–424. 75 indexed citations
19.
Deichert, U., et al.. (1989). Neue Möglichkeiten zur differenzierten Therapie von Leiomyomen des Uterus mit dem GnRH-Agonisten „Zoladex“. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 49(S 1). 96–98. 2 indexed citations
20.
Deichert, U., et al.. (1988). Die transvaginale Hysterokontrastsonographie (HKSG). Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 48(12). 835–844. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Beata Śpiewankiewicz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ram Dgani Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by K Pavelka Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Fatemeh Ghaemmaghami Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mamoru Oikawa Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ian Harley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Diana Lim Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Payson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elisabet Björkholm Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kari Høeg
Rankless by CCL
2026