Tyler A. Scott

1.9k total citations
61 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Tyler A. Scott is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Tyler A. Scott has authored 61 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 18 papers in Public Administration and 16 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Tyler A. Scott's work include Public Policy and Administration Research (18 papers), Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (10 papers) and Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (10 papers). Tyler A. Scott is often cited by papers focused on Public Policy and Administration Research (18 papers), Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (10 papers) and Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (10 papers). Tyler A. Scott collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Peru. Tyler A. Scott's co-authors include Craig W. Thomas, Nícola Ulibarrí, Ryan P. Scott, Robert Greer, Tima T. Moldogaziev, David Carter, Kelly Biedenweg, Huilei Zhao, Xuhui Feng and Ying Li and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews and Chemosphere.

In The Last Decade

Tyler A. Scott

58 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tyler A. Scott United States 19 407 385 363 342 169 61 1.3k
Kent E. Portney United States 23 709 1.7× 286 0.7× 241 0.7× 330 1.0× 121 0.7× 56 1.7k
Rüdiger K.W. Wurzel United Kingdom 17 330 0.8× 148 0.4× 515 1.4× 531 1.6× 342 2.0× 41 1.5k
Anthony R. Zito United Kingdom 22 387 1.0× 216 0.6× 494 1.4× 865 2.5× 486 2.9× 47 1.8k
Megan Mullin United States 17 758 1.9× 107 0.3× 260 0.7× 423 1.2× 93 0.6× 41 1.4k
Mark T. Imperial United States 15 351 0.9× 295 0.8× 516 1.4× 227 0.7× 136 0.8× 24 1.3k
Jeremy Rayner Canada 25 598 1.5× 259 0.7× 941 2.6× 773 2.3× 336 2.0× 87 2.3k
Daniel J. Fiorino United States 11 644 1.6× 140 0.4× 402 1.1× 211 0.6× 194 1.1× 26 1.5k
Darren Sinclair Australia 14 319 0.8× 160 0.4× 263 0.7× 280 0.8× 855 5.1× 58 1.9k
Duncan Russel United Kingdom 23 392 1.0× 118 0.3× 706 1.9× 315 0.9× 255 1.5× 49 1.7k
Dorothy M. Daley United States 15 318 0.8× 159 0.4× 149 0.4× 252 0.7× 141 0.8× 22 888

Countries citing papers authored by Tyler A. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tyler A. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tyler A. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tyler A. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tyler A. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tyler A. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tyler A. Scott. The network helps show where Tyler A. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tyler A. Scott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tyler A. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tyler A. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tyler A. Scott. Tyler A. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Scott, Tyler A., et al.. (2025). Tracing the Path of Knowledge on “Environmental Governance Processes” for Theory‐Building. Environmental Policy and Governance. 35(3). 505–524. 2 indexed citations
2.
Thorne, James H., et al.. (2025). Siting considerations for floating solar photovoltaic energy: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 211. 115360–115360. 4 indexed citations
3.
Condon, Daniel J., Tyler A. Scott, Adam B. Smith, et al.. (2025). Practitioners’ perceived risks to biodiversity from renewable energy expansion through 2050. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 12(1). 2 indexed citations
4.
Ulibarrí, Nícola, et al.. (2024). Agency consultation networks in environmental impact assessment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 34(3). 448–464.
5.
Ulibarrí, Nícola, et al.. (2023). Environmental justice, infrastructure provisioning, and environmental impact assessment: Evidence from the California Environmental Quality Act. Environmental Science & Policy. 146. 66–75. 18 indexed citations
6.
Greer, Robert, Tima T. Moldogaziev, Ryan P. Scott, & Tyler A. Scott. (2023). Signaling Resilience: A Computational Assessment of Narratives in Local Government Budgets. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 33(4). 688–700. 3 indexed citations
9.
Scott, Tyler A., et al.. (2021). Use of Boilerplate Language in Regulatory Documents: Evidence from Environmental Impact Statements. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 32(3). 576–590. 8 indexed citations
10.
Scott, Tyler A., et al.. (2021). The Forest Ranger (and the Legislator): How Local Congressional Politics Shape Policy Implementation in Agency Field Offices. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 32(4). 685–701. 1 indexed citations
11.
Scott, Tyler A. & David Carter. (2019). Collaborative governance or private policy making? When consultants matter more than participation in collaborative environmental planning. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. 21(2). 153–173. 27 indexed citations
12.
Ulibarrí, Nícola, et al.. (2019). How does stakeholder involvement affect environmental impact assessment?. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 79. 106309–106309. 43 indexed citations
13.
Moldogaziev, Tima T., Tyler A. Scott, & Robert Greer. (2019). Organizational Dissolutions in the Public Sector: An Empirical Analysis of Municipal Utility Water Districts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 29(4). 535–555. 18 indexed citations
14.
Scott, Tyler A., Huilei Zhao, Wei Deng, Xuhui Feng, & Ying Li. (2018). Photocatalytic degradation of phenol in water under simulated sunlight by an ultrathin MgO coated Ag/TiO2 nanocomposite. Chemosphere. 216. 1–8. 74 indexed citations
15.
Moldogaziev, Tima T., et al.. (2017). Computational Text Analysis for Public Management Research. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
16.
Scott, Tyler A. & Craig W. Thomas. (2017). Winners and Losers in the Ecology of Games: Network Position, Connectivity, and the Benefits of Collaborative Governance Regimes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 27(4). 647–660. 61 indexed citations
17.
Scott, Tyler A., Tima T. Moldogaziev, & Robert Greer. (2017). Drink what you can pay for: Financing infrastructure in a fragmented water system. Urban Studies. 55(13). 2821–2837. 37 indexed citations
18.
Zerbe, Richard O., et al.. (2015). An Analysis of Benefits from Use of Geographic Information Systems by King County, Washington. 27(1). 13. 1 indexed citations
20.
Scott, Tyler A.. (2015). Does Collaboration Make Any Difference? Linking Collaborative Governance to Environmental Outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 34(3). 537–566. 167 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026