Mark T. Imperial

1.9k total citations
24 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Mark T. Imperial is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark T. Imperial has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 9 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Mark T. Imperial's work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (7 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (6 papers). Mark T. Imperial is often cited by papers focused on Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (7 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (6 papers). Mark T. Imperial collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Mark T. Imperial's co-authors include Tracy Yandle, Timothy M. Hennessey, James L. Perry, Nícola Ulibarrí, Jens Newig, Kirk Emerson, Edward P. Weber, Erik Johnston, Jennifer Thomsen and James L. Perry and has published in prestigious journals such as Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Environmental Management and Ocean & Coastal Management.

In The Last Decade

Mark T. Imperial

24 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark T. Imperial United States 15 516 351 295 237 227 24 1.3k
Richard D. Margerum United States 18 748 1.4× 379 1.1× 305 1.0× 349 1.5× 259 1.1× 45 1.7k
Gwen Arnold United States 16 622 1.2× 397 1.1× 239 0.8× 190 0.8× 396 1.7× 36 1.5k
Lars Carlsson Sweden 12 710 1.4× 375 1.1× 135 0.5× 247 1.0× 228 1.0× 30 1.5k
Thomas C. Beierle United States 8 432 0.8× 403 1.1× 116 0.4× 241 1.0× 118 0.5× 14 1.1k
Edward Challies New Zealand 23 969 1.9× 505 1.4× 139 0.5× 319 1.3× 297 1.3× 52 2.1k
Nícola Ulibarrí United States 20 368 0.7× 329 0.9× 208 0.7× 164 0.7× 188 0.8× 51 1.0k
Donny Roush United States 4 526 1.0× 264 0.8× 111 0.4× 231 1.0× 79 0.3× 6 997
Oliver Fritsch United Kingdom 15 730 1.4× 345 1.0× 79 0.3× 317 1.3× 269 1.2× 44 1.4k
Andreas Duit Sweden 14 659 1.3× 465 1.3× 87 0.3× 232 1.0× 218 1.0× 35 1.5k
Ramiro Berardo United States 22 754 1.5× 744 2.1× 579 2.0× 164 0.7× 702 3.1× 47 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark T. Imperial

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark T. Imperial's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark T. Imperial with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark T. Imperial more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark T. Imperial

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark T. Imperial. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark T. Imperial. The network helps show where Mark T. Imperial may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark T. Imperial

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark T. Imperial. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark T. Imperial based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark T. Imperial. Mark T. Imperial is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ulibarrí, Nícola, Mark T. Imperial, Saba Siddiki, & Hayley Henderson. (2023). Drivers and Dynamics of Collaborative Governance in Environmental Management. Environmental Management. 71(3). 495–504. 31 indexed citations
2.
Imperial, Mark T.. (2022). Life Cycle Dynamics and Developmental Processes in Collaborative Partnerships: Examples From Four Watersheds in the U.S.. Environmental Management. 71(3). 601–619. 9 indexed citations
3.
Prentice, Christopher R., Mark T. Imperial, & Jeffrey L. Brudney. (2019). Conceptualizing the Collaborative Toolbox: A Dimensional Approach to Collaboration. The American Review of Public Administration. 49(7). 792–809. 26 indexed citations
4.
Ayers, Adam L., John N. Kittinger, Mark T. Imperial, & Mehana Blaich Vaughan. (2017). Making the transition to co-management governance arrangements in Hawai‘i: a framework for understanding transaction and transformation costs. International Journal of the Commons. 11(1). 388–388. 25 indexed citations
5.
Imperial, Mark T., Sonia Ospina, Erik Johnston, et al.. (2016). Understanding leadership in a world of shared problems: advancing network governance in large landscape conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 14(3). 126–134. 34 indexed citations
6.
Imperial, Mark T.. (2009). Paradoxes, Possibilities, and the Obstacles to Integrated Water Resources Management: Lessons from the Institutional Rational Choice Literature. 1 indexed citations
7.
Imperial, Mark T., et al.. (2007). Incorporating Service Learning into Public Affairs Programs: Lessons from the Literature. Journal of Public Affairs Education. 13(2). 243–264. 43 indexed citations
8.
Imperial, Mark T., et al.. (2007). Collaborative watershed governance in lake tahoe: an institutional analysis. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior. 10(4). 503–546. 23 indexed citations
9.
Imperial, Mark T.. (2005). Using Collaboration as a Governance Strategy. Administration & Society. 37(3). 281–320. 405 indexed citations
10.
Imperial, Mark T. & Tracy Yandle. (2005). Taking Institutions Seriously: Using the IAD Framework to Analyze Fisheries Policy. Society & Natural Resources. 18(6). 493–509. 85 indexed citations
11.
Imperial, Mark T., et al.. (2003). Moving from Conflict to Collaboration: Watershed Governance in Lake Tahoe. Natural resources journal. 43(4). 1009. 5 indexed citations
12.
Perry, James L. & Mark T. Imperial. (2001). A Decade of Service-Related Research: A Map of the Field. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 30(3). 462–479. 43 indexed citations
13.
Imperial, Mark T. & Timothy M. Hennessey. (2000). Environmental Governance in Watersheds: The Role of Collaboration. Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University). 4 indexed citations
14.
Imperial, Mark T. & Timothy M. Hennessey. (2000). Improving Watershed Governance: Collaboration, Public Value, and Accountability. 4 indexed citations
15.
Imperial, Mark T.. (1999). Environmental Justice and Water Pollution Control. Public Works Management & Policy. 4(2). 100–118. 5 indexed citations
16.
Imperial, Mark T.. (1999). Institutional Analysis and Ecosystem-Based Management: The Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Environmental Management. 24(4). 449–465. 296 indexed citations
17.
Imperial, Mark T. & Timothy M. Hennessey. (1999). Environmental Governance in Watersheds: Collaboration, Public Value, and Accountability. 5 indexed citations
18.
Imperial, Mark T. & Timothy M. Hennessey. (1996). An ecosystem‐based approach to managing estuaries: An assessment of the National Estuary program. Coastal Management. 24(2). 115–139. 36 indexed citations
19.
Lee, Virginia, et al.. (1995). Development of coastal vegetated buffer programs. Coastal Management. 23(2). 91–109. 10 indexed citations
20.
Imperial, Mark T., et al.. (1992). An evolutionary perspective on the development and assessment of the national estuary program. Coastal Management. 20(4). 311–341. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026