Tsung-Sheng Wu
About
In The Last Decade
Tsung-Sheng Wu
5 papers receiving 134 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 90
- Reproductive Medicine 61
- Molecular Biology 43
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 22
- Genetics 12
Countries citing papers authored by Tsung-Sheng Wu
This map shows the geographic impact of Tsung-Sheng Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tsung-Sheng Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tsung-Sheng Wu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tsung-Sheng Wu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tsung-Sheng Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tsung-Sheng Wu. The network helps show where Tsung-Sheng Wu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tsung-Sheng Wu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tsung-Sheng Wu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tsung-Sheng Wu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tsung-Sheng Wu. Tsung-Sheng Wu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 29 | |
| 5 | 87 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.