Tsuneo Nakajima
- Geophysics top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Aquatic Science top 5%
- Ecology
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Michio TagiriApas BakirovShigeru UchiumiJunzō UchiyamaMark HudsonJuzhong ZhangKayoko KamedaTetsumi Takahashi
- Topics
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies (10 papers)Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (10 papers)Ichthyology and Marine Biology (6 papers)
In The Last Decade
Tsuneo Nakajima
27 papers receiving 446 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Geophysics 140
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 135
- Aquatic Science 132
- Ecology 83
- Molecular Biology 71
Countries citing papers authored by Tsuneo Nakajima
This map shows the geographic impact of Tsuneo Nakajima's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tsuneo Nakajima with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tsuneo Nakajima more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tsuneo Nakajima
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tsuneo Nakajima. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tsuneo Nakajima. The network helps show where Tsuneo Nakajima may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tsuneo Nakajima
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tsuneo Nakajima. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tsuneo Nakajima based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tsuneo Nakajima. Tsuneo Nakajima is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 92 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | Risk analysis of habitat utilization by bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) in the Lake Biwa Basin. | 8 |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | A new insecticide, clavamine, from venom of a spider, Nephila clavata - I. Purification and identification of the structure. | 9 |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | A list of the fishes from the coastal waters of aichi prefecture honshu japan | 1 |
About Tsuneo Nakajima
Tsuneo Nakajima is a scholar working on Aquatic Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Paleontology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (10 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (10 papers) and Ichthyology and Marine Biology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (132 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (135 citations) and Geophysics (140 citations). Tsuneo Nakajima has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, China and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Michio Tagiri, Apas Bakirov, Shigeru Uchiumi, Junzō Uchiyama, Mark Hudson, Juzhong Zhang, Kayoko Kameda, Tetsumi Takahashi, Takeshi Yamazaki and Huanzhang Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Copeia and Nature Ecology & Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.