Troy Shelton
About
In The Last Decade
Troy Shelton
3 papers receiving 56 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 34
- Epidemiology 19
- Reproductive Medicine 19
- Molecular Biology 13
- Small Animals 7
Countries citing papers authored by Troy Shelton
This map shows the geographic impact of Troy Shelton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Troy Shelton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Troy Shelton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Troy Shelton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Troy Shelton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Troy Shelton. The network helps show where Troy Shelton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Troy Shelton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Troy Shelton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Troy Shelton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Troy Shelton. Troy Shelton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | Thin-layer cytology and histopathology in the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding. | 35 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.