Trijntje Pasma
About
In The Last Decade
Trijntje Pasma
2 papers receiving 544 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 562
- Language and Linguistics 256
- Literature and Literary Theory 184
- Social Psychology 137
- Philosophy 119
Countries citing papers authored by Trijntje Pasma
This map shows the geographic impact of Trijntje Pasma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trijntje Pasma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trijntje Pasma more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Trijntje Pasma
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Trijntje Pasma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Trijntje Pasma. The network helps show where Trijntje Pasma may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Trijntje Pasma
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Trijntje Pasma. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Trijntje Pasma based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Trijntje Pasma. Trijntje Pasma is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification breakdown → | 597 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.