Trevor Webb

909 total citations
30 papers, 673 citations indexed

About

Trevor Webb is a scholar working on Food Science, Sociology and Political Science and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Trevor Webb has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 673 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Food Science, 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Trevor Webb's work include Risk Perception and Management (9 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (8 papers) and Food Safety and Hygiene (8 papers). Trevor Webb is often cited by papers focused on Risk Perception and Management (9 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (8 papers) and Food Safety and Hygiene (8 papers). Trevor Webb collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Trevor Webb's co-authors include John Coveney, Samantha B. Meyer, Annabelle Wilson, Emma Tonkin, Julie Henderson, Paul Ward, David Ν. Βengston, David P. Fan, Kathryn Williams and J. W. Cary and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Landscape and Urban Planning and BMC Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Trevor Webb

30 papers receiving 625 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Trevor Webb Australia	15	191	185	130	122	110	30	673
Hongbo Liu Australia	16	279 1.5×	171 0.9×	184 1.4×	151 1.2×	53 0.5×	33	734
Torbjørn Trondsen Norway	12	294 1.5×	74 0.4×	111 0.9×	111 0.9×	100 0.9×	24	877
Vera Bitsch Germany	15	185 1.0×	102 0.6×	119 0.9×	254 2.1×	39 0.4×	80	917
Norah MacKendrick United States	14	194 1.0×	352 1.9×	62 0.5×	223 1.8×	96 0.9×	26	890
Mira Lehberger Germany	11	145 0.8×	78 0.4×	144 1.1×	203 1.7×	38 0.3×	28	542
John Lai United States	12	71 0.4×	102 0.6×	94 0.7×	93 0.8×	43 0.4×	39	678
Caterina Contini Italy	20	365 1.9×	122 0.7×	213 1.6×	362 3.0×	38 0.3×	56	964
Jerrod Penn United States	14	79 0.4×	82 0.4×	136 1.0×	90 0.7×	75 0.7×	49	717
Hisako Nomura Japan	15	97 0.5×	78 0.4×	111 0.9×	92 0.8×	71 0.6×	46	850
Carlos E. Carpio United States	16	149 0.8×	141 0.8×	170 1.3×	377 3.1×	48 0.4×	76	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Trevor Webb

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Trevor Webb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trevor Webb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trevor Webb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Trevor Webb

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Trevor Webb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Trevor Webb. The network helps show where Trevor Webb may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Trevor Webb

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Trevor Webb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Trevor Webb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Trevor Webb. Trevor Webb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Tonkin, Emma, Samantha B. Meyer, Paul Ward, et al.. (2022). Testing delay in an environment of low COVID-19 prevalence: A qualitative study of testing behaviour amongst symptomatic South Australians. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 100099–100099. 2 indexed citations

Tonkin, Emma, Trevor Webb, Julie Henderson, et al.. (2021). The health implications of distrust in the food system: findings from the dimensions of trust in food systems scale (DOTIFS scale). BMC Public Health. 21(1). 1468–1468. 6 indexed citations

Henderson, Julie, Paul Ward, Emma Tonkin, et al.. (2020). Developing and Maintaining Public Trust During and Post-COVID-19: Can We Apply a Model Developed for Responding to Food Scares?. Frontiers in Public Health. 8. 369–369. 72 indexed citations

Tonkin, Emma, Annabelle Wilson, John Coveney, et al.. (2019). Consumers respond to a model for (re)building consumer trust in the food system. Food Control. 101. 112–120. 23 indexed citations

Meyer, Samantha B., Annabelle Wilson, Michael Calnan, et al.. (2017). In the interest of food safety: a qualitative study investigating communication and trust between food regulators and food industry in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. BMC Public Health. 17(1). 189–189. 8 indexed citations

Wilson, Annabelle, John Coveney, Samantha B. Meyer, et al.. (2016). A model for (re)building consumer trust in the food system. Health Promotion International. 32(6). 988–1000. 32 indexed citations

Tonkin, Emma, Trevor Webb, John Coveney, Samantha B. Meyer, & Annabelle Wilson. (2016). Consumer trust in the Australian food system – The everyday erosive impact of food labelling. Appetite. 103. 118–127. 60 indexed citations

Tonkin, Emma, John Coveney, Samantha B. Meyer, Annabelle Wilson, & Trevor Webb. (2016). Managing uncertainty about food risks – Consumer use of food labelling. Appetite. 107. 242–252. 45 indexed citations

Wilson, Annabelle, Julie Henderson, John Coveney, et al.. (2016). Management of food incidents byAustralian food regulators. Nutrition & Dietetics. 73(5). 448–454. 4 indexed citations

10.

Tonkin, Emma, Annabelle Wilson, John Coveney, Trevor Webb, & Samantha B. Meyer. (2015). Trust in and through labelling – a systematic review and critique. British Food Journal. 117(1). 318–338. 70 indexed citations

11.

Wilson, Annabelle, Julie Henderson, John Coveney, et al.. (2014). Media actors’ perceptions of their roles in reporting food incidents. BMC Public Health. 14(1). 1305–1305. 10 indexed citations

12.

Wilson, Annabelle, John Coveney, Julie Henderson, et al.. (2013). Trust makers, breakers and brokers: building trust in the Australian food system. BMC Public Health. 13(1). 229–229. 20 indexed citations

13.

Rutledge, Daniel T., et al.. (2010). Thought for food: impacts of urbanisation trends on soil resource availability in New Zealand. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 241–246. 13 indexed citations

14.

Webb, Trevor, David Ν. Βengston, & David P. Fan. (2007). Forest Value Orientations in Australia: An Application of Computer Content Analysis. Environmental Management. 41(1). 52–63. 20 indexed citations

15.

Webb, Trevor. (2004). Understanding behaviour: Social and economic influences on land practice change 1. 1 indexed citations

16.

Βengston, David Ν., Trevor Webb, & David P. Fan. (2004). Shifting Forest Value Orientations in the United States, 1980–2001: A Computer Content Analysis. Environmental Values. 13(3). 373–392. 1 indexed citations

17.

Cary, John & Trevor Webb. (2001). Landcare in Australia: Community Participation and Land Management. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 56(4). 274–278. 21 indexed citations

18.

Williams, Kathryn, et al.. (2001). Social research priorities for forest management. 13(2). 1 indexed citations

19.

Cary, J. W. & Trevor Webb. (2000). Community landcare, the National Landcare Program and the landcare movement: the social dimensions of landcare. 33 indexed citations

20.

Nel, Deon, Leyland Pitt, & Trevor Webb. (1994). Using Chernoff faces to portray service quality data. Journal of Marketing Management. 10(1-3). 247–255. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact