Tracy Frey
About
In The Last Decade
Tracy Frey
4 papers receiving 202 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 55
- General Health Professions 47
- Clinical Psychology 31
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 21
- Oncology 21
Countries citing papers authored by Tracy Frey
This map shows the geographic impact of Tracy Frey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tracy Frey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tracy Frey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tracy Frey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tracy Frey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tracy Frey. The network helps show where Tracy Frey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tracy Frey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tracy Frey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tracy Frey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tracy Frey. Tracy Frey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | The Reporting of Race and Ethnicity in Medical and Science Journals breakdown → | 195 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.