Trace E. Tessier

427 total citations
7 papers, 312 citations indexed

About

Trace E. Tessier is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Trace E. Tessier has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 312 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 3 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Trace E. Tessier's work include Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (5 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (3 papers) and Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (1 paper). Trace E. Tessier is often cited by papers focused on Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (5 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (3 papers) and Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (1 paper). Trace E. Tessier collaborates with scholars based in United States. Trace E. Tessier's co-authors include Natalie L. Adolphi, Edward R. Flynn, Todd Monson, Howard C. Bryant, Dale L. Huber, Debbie M. Lovato, Richard A. Larson, Helen J. Hathaway, Kimberly S. Butler and Christian Bergemann and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer Research, Physics in Medicine and Biology and Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials.

In The Last Decade

Trace E. Tessier

7 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Trace E. Tessier United States	7	203	111	91	75	44	7	312
Maik Liebl Germany	10	264 1.3×	113 1.0×	58 0.6×	82 1.1×	20 0.5×	28	347
Μersini Μakropoulou Greece	10	202 1.0×	66 0.6×	70 0.8×	45 0.6×	35 0.8×	41	351
David E. Bordelon United States	8	311 1.5×	52 0.5×	171 1.9×	45 0.6×	142 3.2×	10	514
Annelies Coene Belgium	12	341 1.7×	109 1.0×	123 1.4×	72 1.0×	47 1.1×	34	414
Yixin Huang China	8	275 1.4×	121 1.1×	134 1.5×	61 0.8×	36 0.8×	13	411
Alessandra Flori Italy	13	124 0.6×	50 0.5×	67 0.7×	71 0.9×	127 2.9×	50	481
Allan R. Foreman United States	6	322 1.6×	79 0.7×	265 2.9×	15 0.2×	54 1.2×	7	470
Gunnar Glöckl Germany	13	414 2.0×	144 1.3×	226 2.5×	41 0.5×	127 2.9×	19	598
A. R. Foreman United States	6	306 1.5×	44 0.4×	208 2.3×	57 0.8×	75 1.7×	8	394
Bettina Kozissnik United States	4	251 1.2×	43 0.4×	173 1.9×	13 0.2×	67 1.5×	6	345

Countries citing papers authored by Trace E. Tessier

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Trace E. Tessier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trace E. Tessier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trace E. Tessier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Trace E. Tessier

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Trace E. Tessier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Trace E. Tessier. The network helps show where Trace E. Tessier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Trace E. Tessier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Trace E. Tessier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Trace E. Tessier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Trace E. Tessier. Trace E. Tessier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

Butler, Kimberly S., Debbie M. Lovato, Natalie L. Adolphi, et al.. (2013). Development of Antibody-Tagged Nanoparticles for Detection of Transplant Rejection Using Biomagnetic Sensors. Cell Transplantation. 22(10). 1943–1954. 9 indexed citations

Adolphi, Natalie L., Kimberly S. Butler, Debbie M. Lovato, et al.. (2012). Imaging of Her2‐targeted magnetic nanoparticles for breast cancer detection: comparison of SQUID‐detected magnetic relaxometry and MRI. Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging. 7(3). 308–319. 71 indexed citations

Hathaway, Helen J., Kimberly S. Butler, Natalie L. Adolphi, et al.. (2011). Detection of breast cancer cells using targeted magnetic nanoparticles and ultra-sensitive magnetic field sensors. Breast Cancer Research. 13(5). R108–R108. 101 indexed citations

Bryant, H. C., Natalie L. Adolphi, Dale L. Huber, et al.. (2010). Magnetic properties of nanoparticles useful for SQUID relaxometry in biomedical applications. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 323(6). 767–774. 16 indexed citations

Adolphi, Natalie L., Dale L. Huber, Howard C. Bryant, et al.. (2010). Characterization of single-core magnetite nanoparticles for magnetic imaging by SQUID relaxometry. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 55(19). 5985–6003. 49 indexed citations

Adolphi, Natalie L., Dale L. Huber, Howard C. Bryant, et al.. (2009). Characterization of magnetite nanoparticles for SQUID-relaxometry and magnetic needle biopsy. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 321(10). 1459–1464. 35 indexed citations

Butler, Kimberly S., Natalie L. Adolphi, Debbie M. Lovato, et al.. (2009). Enhanced Leukemia Cell Detection Using a Novel Magnetic Needle and Nanoparticles. Cancer Research. 69(21). 8310–8316. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact