Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
RF Linear Accelerators
2008424 citationsT.P. WanglerCERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of T.P. Wangler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T.P. Wangler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T.P. Wangler more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T.P. Wangler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T.P. Wangler. The network helps show where T.P. Wangler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T.P. Wangler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T.P. Wangler.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T.P. Wangler based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with T.P. Wangler. T.P. Wangler is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wangler, T.P., K.C.D. Chan, Robert Garnett, & F.L. Krawczyk. (2004). Importance of mode spacing in the design of very high frequency linacs. 2004.
2.
Schulze, Martin, B. Blind, K.C.D. Chan, et al.. (2003). Development of a commissioning plan for the APT linac. Proceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.99CH36366). 5. 3582–3584.2 indexed citations
Garnett, Robert, et al.. (2001). CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF A LOW-p SC PROTON LINAC*.1 indexed citations
8.
Colestock, P., A. F. Harvey, R.L. Sheffield, et al.. (2000). The Beam halo experiment at LEDA. CERN Bulletin. 806.3 indexed citations
9.
Wangler, T.P. & Keith A. Crandall. (2000). Beam Halo in Proton Linac Beams. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 341.16 indexed citations
10.
Wangler, T.P., J.H. Billen, K.R. Crandall, et al.. (1999). DESIGN OF A PROTON SUPERCONDUCTING LINAC FOR A NEUTRON SPALLATION SOURCE.1 indexed citations
11.
Wangler, T.P., E. R. Gray, F.L. Krawczyk, et al.. (1998). Basis for low beam loss in the high-current APT linac. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 83(1). 32–35.9 indexed citations
12.
Jason, Andrew J., T. S. Bhatia, D. Schrage, et al.. (1997). A High Intensity Linac for the National Spallation Neutron Source.
13.
Nath, S., E. R. Gray, T.P. Wangler, & L.M. Young. (1997). Beam Dynamics Design for the APT Integrated Linac.5 indexed citations
14.
Wangler, T.P., et al.. (1997). Integrated Normal-conducting/Superconducting High Power Proton Linac for APT..7 indexed citations
15.
Wangler, T.P.. (1997). New High-Power Linacs and Beam Physics Issues.4 indexed citations
Stovall, J., F.W. Guy, R. H. Stokes, & T.P. Wangler. (1989). Beam funneling studies at Los Alamos. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 278(1). 143–147.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.