Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The future of fish passage science, engineering, and practice
2017397 citationsHans‐Petter Fjeldstad, Torbjørn Forseth et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Torbjørn Forseth
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Torbjørn Forseth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Torbjørn Forseth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Torbjørn Forseth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Torbjørn Forseth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Torbjørn Forseth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Torbjørn Forseth. The network helps show where Torbjørn Forseth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Torbjørn Forseth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Torbjørn Forseth.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Torbjørn Forseth based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Torbjørn Forseth. Torbjørn Forseth is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hindar, Kjetil, Ola H. Diserud, Richard D. Hedger, et al.. (2019). Vurdering av metodikk for andregenerasjons gytebestandsmål for norske laksebestander. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).1 indexed citations
Forseth, Torbjørn & Eva B. Thorstad. (2016). Klassifisering av 104 laksebestander etter kvalitetsnorm for villaks.1 indexed citations
11.
Forseth, Torbjørn, Eva B. Thorstad, & Peder Fiske. (2011). Kvalitetsnormer for laks – anbefalinger til system for klassifisering av villaksbestander.1 indexed citations
12.
Thorstad, Eva B. & Torbjørn Forseth. (2010). Status for norske laksebestander i 2010. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)).1 indexed citations
13.
Forseth, Torbjørn, Morten Stickler, Ola Ugedal, et al.. (2009). Utfall av Trollheim kraftverk i juli 2008 - Effekter av fiskebestandene i Surna. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)).1 indexed citations
14.
Forseth, Torbjørn, Anders Palmstrøm Jørgensen, & Tor Atle Mo. (2007). Pilotkartlegging av PKD i norske laksevassdrag. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)).1 indexed citations
Finstad, Anders G. & Torbjørn Forseth. (2006). Adaptation to ice-cover conditions in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.. Evolutionary ecology research. 8(7). 1249–1262.18 indexed citations
17.
Fiske, Peder, Torbjørn Forseth, Lars P. Hansen, & Nils Arne Hvidsten. (2006). Evaluering av oppleieordningen av kilenotfiske etter laks i Trondheimsfjorden. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)).
18.
Finstad, Anders G., Torbjørn Forseth, Tor F. Næsje, & Ola Ugedal. (2005). Effekter av isdekke på vinter-overlevelse til laksunger i Altaelva. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)).1 indexed citations
19.
Ugedal, Ola, Torbjørn Forseth, & Trygve Hesthagen. (2005). Garnfangst og størrelse på gytefisk som hjelpemiddel i karakterisering av aurebestander. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)).5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.