The future of fish passage science, engineering, and practice

397 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2017, received 397 indexed citations. Written by Ana Silva, Martyn C. Lucas, Theodore Castro‐Santos, Christos Katopodis, Lee J. Baumgartner, Jason D. Thiem, Kim Aarestrup, Paulo dos Santos Pompeu, Gordon O’Brien and Douglas C. Braun covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Water Science and Technology and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nature and Landscape Conservation (359 citations), Ecology (242 citations) and Aquatic Science (130 citations). Published in Fish and Fisheries.

Countries where authors are citing The future of fish passage science, engineering, and practice

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The future of fish passage science, engineering, and practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The future of fish passage science, engineering, and practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The future of fish passage science, engineering, and practice more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The future of fish passage science, engineering, and practice

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The future of fish passage science, engineering, and practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The future of fish passage science, engineering, and practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/faf.12258.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026