Ton Otto

47 papers receiving 608 citations

Hit Papers

Design Anthropology : Theory and Practice 2013 · 227 citations
2270+4+8Years since publication50100150200

Peers

Ton Otto
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Museology 94
  • Geography, Planning and Development 141
  • Anthropology 213
  • Human-Computer Interaction 112
  • Demography 139
Replace Janet Hoskins with:
Janet Hoskins United States
Tim Ingold United Kingdom
Susanne Küchler United Kingdom
Paul Rodaway United Kingdom
Marja Warehime United States
Luke Eric Lassiter United States
Jean‐Pierre Warnier France
James Leach United Kingdom
Trevor H.J. Marchand United Kingdom
Susan M. Pearce United Kingdom
Ton Otto relative to Janet Hoskins United States Janet Hoskins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Janet Hoskins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ton Otto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ton Otto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ton Otto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ton Otto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ton Otto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ton Otto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ton Otto. The network helps show where Ton Otto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Ton Otto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ton Otto Line = papers co-authored together Ton Otto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Design Anthropology : Theory and Practice
Hit paper breakdown →
2013227
2 200885
3 199850
4 199848
5 201335
6
Tradition and agency : tracing cultural continuity and invention /
200531
7 202325
8 199223
9 199219
10 201319
11 201515
12 201315
13 201213
14 200811
15
The Asaro Mudmen: Local Property, Public Culture?
199610
16 201310
17 200910
18 20229
19 19979
20 19979

About Ton Otto

Ton Otto is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Geography, Planning and Development and Museology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 735 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (15 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (14 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (8 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (5 papers), Crafts, Textile, and Design (5 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (4 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (4 papers) and Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Museology (94 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (141 citations), Anthropology (213 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (112 citations) and Demography (139 citations). Ton Otto has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Australia and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Charlotte Smith, Wendy Gunn, Rane Willerslev, Nicholas Thomas, John R. Barker, N. Thomas, Rosita Henry, Heike Winschiers‐Theophilus, Michael Wood and H.G.G.M. Driessen. Their work appears in journals such as The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Anthropological Forum, Hau Journal of Ethnographic Theory and Social Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact