Tomotaka Nakajima
- Surgery top 10%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Pharmacology
- Co-authors
- Kazutoshi HamadaHiroaki FukudaTaisuke TomatsuA. TomonagaKyosuke FujikawaYasuo YoshiharaZong‐Ping LuoMark E. Zobitz
- Topics
- Shoulder Injury and Treatment (11 papers)Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (10 papers)Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (4 papers)
- Journals
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related ResearchJournal of Orthopaedic Research®Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesThailand
In The Last Decade
Tomotaka Nakajima
12 papers receiving 499 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Surgery 516
- Epidemiology 389
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 132
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 41
- Pharmacology 20
Countries citing papers authored by Tomotaka Nakajima
This map shows the geographic impact of Tomotaka Nakajima's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomotaka Nakajima with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomotaka Nakajima more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tomotaka Nakajima
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomotaka Nakajima. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomotaka Nakajima. The network helps show where Tomotaka Nakajima may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tomotaka Nakajima
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tomotaka Nakajima. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tomotaka Nakajima based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tomotaka Nakajima. Tomotaka Nakajima is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 58 | |
| 4 | The Postoperative Outcome of Modified Inferior Capsular Shift with Different Arm Positions of Immobilization in Athletes | 2 |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 48 | |
| 7 | Comparison of conservative and operative treatments of massive rotator cuff tears. | 20 |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 189 | |
| 11 | 138 | |
| 12 | 14 |
About Tomotaka Nakajima
Tomotaka Nakajima is a scholar working on Equine, Epidemiology and Surgery, having authored 12 papers that have together received 536 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shoulder Injury and Treatment (11 papers), Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (10 papers) and Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (132 citations), Surgery (516 citations) and Epidemiology (389 citations). Tomotaka Nakajima has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Kazutoshi Hamada, Hiroaki Fukuda, Taisuke Tomatsu, A. Tomonaga, Kyosuke Fujikawa, Yasuo Yoshihara, Zong‐Ping Luo, Mark E. Zobitz, Akiyoshi Handa and Hirotsugu Fukuda. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Journal of Orthopaedic Research® and Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.