Tomomi Sakamoto
- Molecular Biology
- Oncology top 10%
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Cancer Research
- Co-authors
- Yoshihito YokoyamaShigemi SatoYoshiharu SaitoMasayuki FutagamiM UmemotoAtsushi YanaiharaD. Stephen Charnock‐JonesS. K. Smith
- Topics
- Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (4 papers)Lymphatic System and Diseases (3 papers)Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited KingdomHungary
In The Last Decade
Tomomi Sakamoto
21 papers receiving 590 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Molecular Biology 337
- Oncology 238
- Reproductive Medicine 173
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 122
- Cancer Research 103
Countries citing papers authored by Tomomi Sakamoto
This map shows the geographic impact of Tomomi Sakamoto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomomi Sakamoto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomomi Sakamoto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tomomi Sakamoto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomomi Sakamoto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomomi Sakamoto. The network helps show where Tomomi Sakamoto may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tomomi Sakamoto
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tomomi Sakamoto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tomomi Sakamoto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tomomi Sakamoto. Tomomi Sakamoto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 35 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 129 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 87 | |
| 12 | 55 | |
| 13 | Gene transfer of a soluble receptor of VEGF inhibits the growth of experimental eyelid malignant melanoma. | 30 |
| 14 | 41 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | [Electron microscopic histochemical studies on the localization of hyaluronic acid in Wharton's jelly of the human umbilical cord]. | 8 |
| 18 | 15 Effect of EGF on the preimplantation development of mouse embryos fertilized in vitro. | 1 |
| 19 | [Pharmacodynamic tests in patients with mitral valve prolapse]. | 0 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Tomomi Sakamoto
Tomomi Sakamoto is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Aging and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 615 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (4 papers), Lymphatic System and Diseases (3 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (173 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (122 citations) and Oncology (238 citations). Tomomi Sakamoto has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United Kingdom and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Yoshihito Yokoyama, Shigemi Sato, Yoshiharu Saito, Masayuki Futagami, M Umemoto, Atsushi Yanaihara, D. Stephen Charnock‐Jones, S. K. Smith, Julie M. Hastings and Makoto Emoto. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, Scientific Reports and British Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.