Citations per year, relative to Tomasz Żylicz Tomasz Żylicz (= 1×)
peers
Heini Ahtiainen
Countries citing papers authored by Tomasz Żylicz
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Tomasz Żylicz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomasz Żylicz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomasz Żylicz more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomasz Żylicz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomasz Żylicz. The network helps show where Tomasz Żylicz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tomasz Żylicz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tomasz Żylicz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tomasz Żylicz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tomasz Żylicz. Tomasz Żylicz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Żylicz, Tomasz. (2020). Straty z tytułu zanieczyszczenia środowiska. AURA - Tidsskrift for akademiske studier av nyreligiøsitet. 3. 18–19.1 indexed citations
Dudek, Daniel J., et al.. (1993). Implementing tradable rights in Poland. A case study of Chorzów. 58–75.4 indexed citations
20.
Żylicz, Tomasz. (1993). Instrumenty ekonomiczne w polskiej polityce ochrony środowiska: stan i perspektywy. 79–96.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.