Tom Sexton
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 34
- RNA Research and Splicing 18
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 8
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 5
- RNA modifications and cancer 4
- Plant Science top 2%
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 14
- Genetics top 5%
- Aging top 10%
- Biophysics top 5%
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 5
- Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior 5
- Co-authors
- Giacomo CavalliFrédéric BantigniesEitan YaffeEphraim KenigsbergMichael HoichmanBenjamin LeblancPeter FraserSuzana Hadjur
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Tom Sexton
48 papers receiving 4.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Molecular Biology 3.6k
- Plant Science 1.3k
- Genetics 499
- Aging 25
- Biophysics 78
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Sexton
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Sexton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Sexton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Sexton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Sexton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Sexton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Sexton. The network helps show where Tom Sexton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Sexton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 30 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 115 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 27 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 281 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 32 | |
| 17 | Three-Dimensional Folding and Functional Organization Principles of the Drosophila Genomebreakdown → | 2012 | 1377 |
| 18 | 2007 | 54 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 187 | |
| 20 | 1994 | 73 |
About Tom Sexton
Tom Sexton is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 49 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (34 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (18 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (14 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (5 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (5 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (3.6k citations), Plant Science (1.3k citations) and Genetics (499 citations). Tom Sexton has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Giacomo Cavalli, Frédéric Bantignies, Eitan Yaffe, Ephraim Kenigsberg, Michael Hoichman, Benjamin Leblanc, Peter Fraser, Suzana Hadjur, Bradley S. Cobb and Amanda G. Fisher. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Nucleic Acids Research, Cell Reports, Cell and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.