Tom Sante
Impact in
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Genetics top 10%
- Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Genomics and Rare Diseases
Papers in
- Genetics 9
- Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities 9
- Genomics and Rare Diseases 3
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 2
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 2
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 2
- Co-authors
- Björn Menten (12 shared papers)Annelies Dheedene (6 shared papers)Sarah Vergult (6 shared papers)Elfride De Baere (3 shared papers)Katleen De Preter (2 shared papers)Hannah Verdin (2 shared papers)Bram De Wilde (2 shared papers)Petra De Sutter (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Genetics in Medicine (3 papers)Scientific Reports (2 papers)Human Mutation (1 paper)Clinical Cancer Research (1 paper)Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Tom Sante
16 papers receiving 456 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Cancer Research 121
- Genetics 209
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 91
- Ophthalmology 34
- Molecular Biology 246
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Sante
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Sante's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Sante with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Sante more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Sante
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Sante. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Sante. The network helps show where Tom Sante may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Sante, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 81 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 56 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 25 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 16 | Matepair sequencing for the detection of chromosomal aberrations in patients with intellectual disability and congenital malformations | 2012 | 3 |
About Tom Sante
Tom Sante is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Neurology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (9 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (4 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (3 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (121 citations), Genetics (209 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (91 citations), Ophthalmology (34 citations) and Molecular Biology (246 citations). Tom Sante has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Björn Menten, Annelies Dheedene, Sarah Vergult, Elfride De Baere, Katleen De Preter, Hannah Verdin, Bram De Wilde, Petra De Sutter, Jo Van Dorpe and Malaïka Van Der Linden. Their work appears in journals such as Genetics in Medicine, Scientific Reports, Human Mutation, Clinical Cancer Research and Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.