Tom LeClair

570 total citations
13 papers, 213 citations indexed

About

Tom LeClair is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom LeClair has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 213 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 1 paper in Sociology and Political Science and 0 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Tom LeClair's work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (4 papers), Short Stories in Global Literature (2 papers) and Themes in Literature Analysis (1 paper). Tom LeClair is often cited by papers focused on Contemporary Literature and Criticism (4 papers), Short Stories in Global Literature (2 papers) and Themes in Literature Analysis (1 paper). Tom LeClair collaborates with scholars based in United States. Tom LeClair's co-authors include N. Katherine Hayles, Larry McCaffery, W. M. Hagen, Patrick O’Donnell, Thomas Schaub and John W. Aldridge and has published in prestigious journals such as The Modern Language Review, SubStance and American Literature.

In The Last Decade

Tom LeClair

11 papers receiving 110 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tom LeClair United States	7	130	40	24	21	16	13	213
Michael Anesko United States	7	124 1.0×	34 0.8×	19 0.8×	11 0.5×	16 1.0×	27	175
John Barth United States	8	110 0.8×	48 1.2×	26 1.1×	24 1.1×	6 0.4×	19	180
Ed Folsom United States	7	117 0.9×	31 0.8×	18 0.8×	17 0.8×	10 0.6×	65	160
Jerome Klinkowitz United States	7	102 0.8×	24 0.6×	23 1.0×	20 1.0×	18 1.1×	55	153
Pierre Saint-Amand	5	102 0.8×	45 1.1×	41 1.7×	19 0.9×	16 1.0×	23	209
Peter Widdowson United Kingdom	7	103 0.8×	46 1.1×	18 0.8×	13 0.6×	17 1.1×	18	181
Richard Badenhausen United States	6	82 0.6×	33 0.8×	14 0.6×	12 0.6×	9 0.6×	12	145
Eliot Weinberger	7	62 0.5×	37 0.9×	20 0.8×	13 0.6×	20 1.3×	18	144
Joseph F. Graham	3	60 0.5×	52 1.3×	44 1.8×	13 0.6×	11 0.7×	4	210
Robert Burgoyne United States	6	44 0.3×	46 1.1×	13 0.5×	27 1.3×	17 1.1×	17	136

Countries citing papers authored by Tom LeClair

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom LeClair's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom LeClair with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom LeClair more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom LeClair

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom LeClair. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom LeClair. The network helps show where Tom LeClair may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom LeClair

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom LeClair. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom LeClair based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom LeClair. Tom LeClair is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

LeClair, Tom. (2016). Familiar Core. American book review/The American book review. 37(2). 9–9. 1 indexed citations

2.

LeClair, Tom. (2010). For a Good Time, Read Tom. American book review/The American book review. 31(3). 25–25. 1 indexed citations

3.

LeClair, Tom. (1996). The Prodigious Fiction of Richard Powers, William Vollmann, and David Foster Wallace. Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction. 38(1). 12–37. 26 indexed citations

4.

LeClair, Tom & N. Katherine Hayles. (1991). Chaos Bound: Orderly Disorder in Contemporary Literature and Science. SubStance. 20(1). 129–129. 30 indexed citations

5.

LeClair, Tom, et al.. (1990). The Art of Excess: Mastery in Contemporary American Fiction.. American Literature. 62(2). 360–360. 26 indexed citations

6.

LeClair, Tom. (1989). The art of excess. 3 indexed citations

7.

LeClair, Tom, et al.. (1989). Being and Race: Black Writing since 1970.. American Literature. 61(1). 135–135. 29 indexed citations

8.

Schaub, Thomas & Tom LeClair. (1989). Don DeLillo's Systems: "What Is Now Natural". Contemporary Literature. 30(1). 128–128. 2 indexed citations

9.

LeClair, Tom, et al.. (1989). The Noise of Culture: Literary Texts in a World of Information. SubStance. 18(2). 129–129. 14 indexed citations

10.

LeClair, Tom, et al.. (1989). In the Loop: Don DeLillo and the Systems Novel.. American Literature. 61(1). 132–132. 56 indexed citations

11.

Aldridge, John W., et al.. (1987). The American Novel and the Way We Live Now. The Modern Language Review. 82(4). 942–942. 1 indexed citations

12.

LeClair, Tom & Patrick O’Donnell. (1987). Passionate Doubts: Designs of Interpretation in Contemporary American Fiction.. American Literature. 59(2). 299–299. 1 indexed citations

13.

Hagen, W. M., Tom LeClair, & Larry McCaffery. (1984). Anything Can Happen: Interviews with Contemporary American Novelists. World Literature Today. 58(4). 605–605. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact