Todd W. Pierson
- Ecology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Anna M. McKeeStephen F. SpearTravis C. GlennTroy J. KieranBenjamin M. FitzpatrickSandra L. HoffbergJohn W. FingerSean M. Rogers
- Topics
- Amphibian and Reptile Biology (18 papers)Genetic diversity and population structure (14 papers)Animal Behavior and Reproduction (9 papers)
- Journals
- Scientific ReportsThe American NaturalistPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
- Partner nations
- United StatesArgentinaGermany
In The Last Decade
Todd W. Pierson
29 papers receiving 567 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Ecology 333
- Molecular Biology 290
- Genetics 168
- Global and Planetary Change 117
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 103
Countries citing papers authored by Todd W. Pierson
This map shows the geographic impact of Todd W. Pierson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Todd W. Pierson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Todd W. Pierson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Todd W. Pierson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Todd W. Pierson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Todd W. Pierson. The network helps show where Todd W. Pierson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Todd W. Pierson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Todd W. Pierson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Todd W. Pierson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Todd W. Pierson. Todd W. Pierson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 116 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 23 |
About Todd W. Pierson
Todd W. Pierson is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change and Genetics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 582 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amphibian and Reptile Biology (18 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (14 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (72 citations), Ecology (333 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (103 citations). Todd W. Pierson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Argentina and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Anna M. McKee, Stephen F. Spear, Travis C. Glenn, Troy J. Kieran, Benjamin M. Fitzpatrick, Sandra L. Hoffberg, John W. Finger, Sean M. Rogers, Píndaro Díaz‐Jáimes and Kerin E. Bentley. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, The American Naturalist and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.