Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Multi-functional dielectric elastomer artificial muscles for soft and smart machines
2012533 citationsIain A. Anderson, Todd Gisby et al.Journal of Applied Physicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Todd Gisby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Todd Gisby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Todd Gisby more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Todd Gisby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Todd Gisby. The network helps show where Todd Gisby may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Todd Gisby
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Todd Gisby.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Todd Gisby based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Todd Gisby. Todd Gisby is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rosset, Samuel, et al.. (2013). Tunable grating with active feedback. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8687. 86872F–86872F.4 indexed citations
Anderson, Iain A., Todd Gisby, Thomas G. McKay, Benjamin O’Brien, & Emilio P. Calius. (2012). Multi-functional dielectric elastomer artificial muscles for soft and smart machines. Journal of Applied Physics. 112(4).533 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Anderson, Iain A., et al.. (2011). A soft and dexterous motor. Applied Physics Letters. 98(12).43 indexed citations
12.
Anderson, Iain A., et al.. (2011). Flexidrive: a soft artificial muscle motor. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7976. 79761T–79761T.3 indexed citations
13.
Gisby, Todd, Benjamin O’Brien, Sheng Quan Xie, Emilio P. Calius, & Iain A. Anderson. (2011). Closed loop control of dielectric elastomer actuators. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7976. 797620–797620.17 indexed citations
14.
O’Brien, Benjamin, Todd Gisby, Sheng Quan Xie, Emilio P. Calius, & Iain A. Anderson. (2010). Biomimetic control for DEA arrays. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7642. 764220–764220.8 indexed citations
Gisby, Todd, Sheng Quan Xie, Emilio P. Calius, & Iain A. Anderson. (2009). Integrated sensing and actuation of muscle-like actuators. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7287. 728707–728707.23 indexed citations
Ieropoulos, Ioannis, et al.. (2009). Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 2009.71 indexed citations
20.
Gisby, Todd, Emilio P. Calius, Sheng Quan Xie, & Iain A. Anderson. (2008). An adaptive control method for dielectric elastomer devices. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6927. 69271C–69271C.30 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.