Tobias Götze
About
In The Last Decade
Tobias Götze
10 papers receiving 299 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Molecular Biology 163
- Oncology 86
- Surgery 77
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 72
- Hepatology 45
Countries citing papers authored by Tobias Götze
This map shows the geographic impact of Tobias Götze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tobias Götze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tobias Götze more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tobias Götze
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tobias Götze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tobias Götze. The network helps show where Tobias Götze may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tobias Götze
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tobias Götze. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tobias Götze based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tobias Götze. Tobias Götze is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 34 | |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 116 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 59 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.