Tobias Baum

534 total citations
12 papers, 229 citations indexed

About

Tobias Baum is a scholar working on Information Systems, Software and Computer Science Applications. According to data from OpenAlex, Tobias Baum has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 229 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Information Systems, 7 papers in Software and 5 papers in Computer Science Applications. Recurrent topics in Tobias Baum's work include Software Engineering Research (12 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (7 papers) and Open Source Software Innovations (5 papers). Tobias Baum is often cited by papers focused on Software Engineering Research (12 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (7 papers) and Open Source Software Innovations (5 papers). Tobias Baum collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Netherlands. Tobias Baum's co-authors include Kurt Schneider, Alberto Bacchelli, Enrico Fregnan, Fabio Palomba, Davide Spadini, Magiel Bruntink, Stefan Hanenberg, Larissa Braz and Steffen Herbold and has published in prestigious journals such as Information and Software Technology, Lecture notes in computer science and Empirical Software Engineering.

In The Last Decade

Tobias Baum

12 papers receiving 229 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tobias Baum Germany 9 216 110 76 47 21 12 229
Ioannis Samoladas Greece 3 154 0.7× 73 0.7× 83 1.1× 32 0.7× 27 1.3× 3 193
Felipe Ebert Netherlands 9 263 1.2× 122 1.1× 68 0.9× 84 1.8× 52 2.5× 14 289
Maen Hammad Jordan 10 302 1.4× 140 1.3× 62 0.8× 99 2.1× 84 4.0× 29 332
Ganesh Samarthyam Germany 7 200 0.9× 106 1.0× 35 0.5× 56 1.2× 50 2.4× 9 228
Emad Aghajani Switzerland 7 183 0.8× 67 0.6× 30 0.4× 62 1.3× 89 4.2× 13 234
Tiago L. Alves Portugal 7 214 1.0× 163 1.5× 25 0.3× 70 1.5× 56 2.7× 12 241
Weiqin Zou China 6 257 1.2× 143 1.3× 55 0.7× 83 1.8× 59 2.8× 7 280
Gias Uddin Canada 9 269 1.2× 44 0.4× 71 0.9× 81 1.7× 123 5.9× 10 306
Henrique Rocha United States 7 127 0.6× 49 0.4× 15 0.2× 42 0.9× 37 1.8× 23 146
Medha Umarji United States 8 137 0.6× 46 0.4× 44 0.6× 15 0.3× 32 1.5× 11 172

Countries citing papers authored by Tobias Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tobias Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tobias Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tobias Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tobias Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tobias Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tobias Baum. The network helps show where Tobias Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tobias Baum

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tobias Baum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tobias Baum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tobias Baum. Tobias Baum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Fregnan, Enrico, et al.. (2022). Do explicit review strategies improve code review performance? Towards understanding the role of cognitive load. Empirical Software Engineering. 27(4). 8 indexed citations
2.
Fregnan, Enrico, et al.. (2021). ChangeViz: Enhancing the GitHub Pull Request Interface with Method Call Information. Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich). 115–119. 5 indexed citations
3.
Fregnan, Enrico, et al.. (2020). Do Explicit Review Strategies Improve Code Review Performance?. Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich). 606–610. 7 indexed citations
4.
Baum, Tobias, Steffen Herbold, & Kurt Schneider. (2020). GIMO: A multi-objective anytime rule mining system to ease iterative feedback from domain experts. GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen). 8. 100040–100040. 1 indexed citations
5.
Spadini, Davide, Fabio Palomba, Tobias Baum, et al.. (2019). Test-Driven Code Review: An Empirical Study. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 1061–1072. 22 indexed citations
6.
Baum, Tobias, Kurt Schneider, & Alberto Bacchelli. (2019). Associating working memory capacity and code change ordering with code review performance. Empirical Software Engineering. 24(4). 1762–1798. 31 indexed citations
7.
Fregnan, Enrico, Tobias Baum, Fabio Palomba, & Alberto Bacchelli. (2018). A survey on software coupling relations and tools. Information and Software Technology. 107. 159–178. 18 indexed citations
8.
Baum, Tobias, et al.. (2017). The Choice of Code Review Process: A Survey on the State of the Practice. Lecture notes in computer science. 111–127. 19 indexed citations
9.
Baum, Tobias, Kurt Schneider, & Alberto Bacchelli. (2017). On the Optimal Order of Reading Source Code Changes for Review. Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich). 329–340. 26 indexed citations
10.
Baum, Tobias, et al.. (2016). A Faceted Classification Scheme for Change-Based Industrial Code Review Processes. 74–85. 31 indexed citations
11.
Baum, Tobias, et al.. (2016). Factors influencing code review processes in industry. 85–96. 52 indexed citations
12.
Baum, Tobias, et al.. (2016). Comparing pre commit reviews and post commit reviews using process simulation. 26–35. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026