Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within
it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.
Environmental Health Perspectives
20021.2k citationsTJ GoehlEnvironmental Health Perspectivesprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of TJ Goehl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by TJ Goehl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites TJ Goehl more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by TJ Goehl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by TJ Goehl. The network helps show where TJ Goehl may publish in the future.
TJ Goehl is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Cancer Research and Genetics, having authored 3 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (1 paper), Air Quality and Health Impacts (1 paper) and Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (514 citations), Pollution (171 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (69 citations). TJ Goehl has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Health Perspectives.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.