Ting-Ren Lu

49 papers receiving 604 citations

Peers

Ting-Ren Lu
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 12
  • Virology 42
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 104
  • Oncology 119
  • Pharmaceutical Science 29
Replace Da-Yong Lu with:
Da-Yong Lu China
Ganesh S. Moorthy United States
Sarah L. Greig New Zealand
Leslie Carstensen Floren United States
David A. DeGoey United States
Steven Hansel United States
Carol Collins United States
Amy Y. Yang United States
Andrew P. Lea United States
Ting-Ren Lu relative to Da-Yong Lu China Da-Yong Lu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Da-Yong Lu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ting-Ren Lu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ting-Ren Lu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ting-Ren Lu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ting-Ren Lu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ting-Ren Lu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ting-Ren Lu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ting-Ren Lu. The network helps show where Ting-Ren Lu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ting-Ren Lu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ting-Ren Lu Line = papers co-authored together Ting-Ren Lu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017137
2 201034
3 201734
4 201731
5 201931
6 201328
7 201528
8 201822
9 201521
10 201221
11 201817
12 201817
13 201617
14 202015
15 201815
16 201214
17 201013
18 201711
19 201611
20 201611

About Ting-Ren Lu

Ting-Ren Lu is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Oncology, Pharmacology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 57 papers that have together received 672 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (13 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (5 papers), Chemical Reactions and Isotopes (5 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (4 papers), Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies (4 papers), PARP inhibition in cancer therapy (4 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (4 papers) and Cancer Research and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (12 citations), Virology (42 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (104 citations), Oncology (119 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (29 citations). Ting-Ren Lu has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Da-Yong Lu, Hongying Wu, Bin Xu, Nagendra Sastry Yarla, Jian Ding, Jian Ding, Dayong Lu, Hong Zhu, Enhong Chen and Peng‐Peng Zhu. Their work appears in journals such as Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials, Infectious Disorders - Drug Targets, Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry, Current Drug Therapy and Central Nervous System Agents in Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact