Ting Lei
About
In The Last Decade
Ting Lei
40 papers receiving 559 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Molecular Biology 335
- Cancer Research 145
- Oncology 111
- Biomedical Engineering 102
- Food Science 63
Countries citing papers authored by Ting Lei
This map shows the geographic impact of Ting Lei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ting Lei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ting Lei more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ting Lei
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ting Lei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ting Lei. The network helps show where Ting Lei may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ting Lei
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ting Lei. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ting Lei based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ting Lei. Ting Lei is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 40 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 88 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.