Tin‐Fook Ngai

33 total papers · 721 total citations
26 papers, 458 citations indexed

About

Tin‐Fook Ngai is a scholar working on Hardware and Architecture, Computer Networks and Communications and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Tin‐Fook Ngai has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 458 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Hardware and Architecture, 13 papers in Computer Networks and Communications and 8 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in Tin‐Fook Ngai's work include Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (21 papers), Embedded Systems Design Techniques (9 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (6 papers). Tin‐Fook Ngai is often cited by papers focused on Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (21 papers), Embedded Systems Design Techniques (9 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (6 papers). Tin‐Fook Ngai collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Tin‐Fook Ngai's co-authors include Xiaofeng Li, Pen-Chung Yew, M.J. Irwin, Wei‐Chung Hsu, Yang Chen, Roy Dz-Ching Ju, Sun Chan, Tong Chen, Allan Knies and Youngsoo Choi and has published in prestigious journals such as ACM SIGPLAN Notices, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing and Software Practice and Experience.

In The Last Decade

Tin‐Fook Ngai

25 papers receiving 432 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Tin‐Fook Ngai 366 304 129 73 61 26 458
Mohammad Ali Ghodrat 332 0.9× 259 0.9× 131 1.0× 41 0.6× 54 0.9× 22 424
Benoît Dupont de Dinechin 414 1.1× 307 1.0× 122 0.9× 54 0.7× 32 0.5× 34 531
Peng Wei 308 0.8× 222 0.7× 136 1.1× 128 1.8× 60 1.0× 19 491
Daniel A. Connors 331 0.9× 286 0.9× 144 1.1× 75 1.0× 55 0.9× 29 458
Roy Dz-Ching Ju 429 1.2× 320 1.1× 95 0.7× 103 1.4× 57 0.9× 27 487
Shail Aditya 413 1.1× 261 0.9× 98 0.8× 90 1.2× 20 0.3× 17 471
Karthik Gururaj 367 1.0× 268 0.9× 168 1.3× 44 0.6× 31 0.5× 21 464
J.T. Rahmeh 371 1.0× 325 1.1× 181 1.4× 45 0.6× 38 0.6× 16 458
Tim Todman 314 0.9× 187 0.6× 163 1.3× 58 0.8× 22 0.4× 38 414
Dileep Bhandarkar 393 1.1× 393 1.3× 94 0.7× 39 0.5× 56 0.9× 30 522

Countries citing papers authored by Tin‐Fook Ngai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tin‐Fook Ngai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tin‐Fook Ngai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tin‐Fook Ngai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tin‐Fook Ngai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tin‐Fook Ngai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tin‐Fook Ngai. The network helps show where Tin‐Fook Ngai may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tin‐Fook Ngai

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tin‐Fook Ngai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tin‐Fook Ngai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tin‐Fook Ngai. Tin‐Fook Ngai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026