Tina‐Marie Proffitt
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Biological Psychiatry top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Co-authors
- Gregor BergerKelly AllottPatrick D. McGorryEóin KillackeyPing LiuChristos PantelisStephen J. WoodWarrick J. Brewer
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (14 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBiological PsychiatryThe British Journal of Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Tina‐Marie Proffitt
21 papers receiving 796 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Psychiatry and Mental health 453
- Biological Psychiatry 160
- Clinical Psychology 122
- Cognitive Neuroscience 110
- Philosophy 108
Countries citing papers authored by Tina‐Marie Proffitt
This map shows the geographic impact of Tina‐Marie Proffitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina‐Marie Proffitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina‐Marie Proffitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tina‐Marie Proffitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina‐Marie Proffitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina‐Marie Proffitt. The network helps show where Tina‐Marie Proffitt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tina‐Marie Proffitt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tina‐Marie Proffitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tina‐Marie Proffitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tina‐Marie Proffitt. Tina‐Marie Proffitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 26 | |
| 3 | 66 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 52 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 144 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 93 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 114 | |
| 20 | 29 |
About Tina‐Marie Proffitt
Tina‐Marie Proffitt is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 21 papers that have together received 813 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (14 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (160 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (453 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (57 citations). Tina‐Marie Proffitt has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gregor Berger, Kelly Allott, Patrick D. McGorry, Eóin Killackey, Ping Liu, Christos Pantelis, Stephen J. Wood, Warrick J. Brewer, Sue Cotton and R. Mark Wellard. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Biological Psychiatry and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.