Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis
20054.7k citationsTimothy Coelli, D. S. Prasada Rao et al.DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven)profile →
A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data
19954.2k citationsGeorge E. Battese, Timothy CoelliEmpirical Economicsprofile →
Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in India
19922.0k citationsGeorge E. Battese, Timothy CoelliJournal of Productivity Analysisprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Timothy Coelli
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Timothy Coelli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timothy Coelli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timothy Coelli more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timothy Coelli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timothy Coelli. The network helps show where Timothy Coelli may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Timothy Coelli
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Timothy Coelli.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Timothy Coelli based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Timothy Coelli. Timothy Coelli is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Coelli, Timothy, et al.. (2007). Econometric Estimation of an Input Distance Function in a System of Equations. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1–48.4 indexed citations
3.
Coelli, Timothy, D. S. Prasada Rao, Christopher J. O’Donnell, & George E. Battese. (2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven).4670 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Rao, D. S. Prasada & Timothy Coelli. (2004). Catch-up and Convergence in Global Agricultural Productivity, 1980-1995. Indian Economic Review. 39(1). 123–148.35 indexed citations
Rao, D. S. Prasada, Timothy Coelli, & Mohammad Alauddin. (2004). Agricultural productivity growth, employment and poverty in developing countries, 1970-2000. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 1–90.27 indexed citations
Battese, George E. & Timothy Coelli. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics. 20(2). 325–332.4207 indexed citations breakdown →
Battese, George E. & Timothy Coelli. (1992). Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in India. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 3(1-2). 153–169.1986 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.