Timothée Bourgeois
About
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Timothée Bourgeois
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Timothée Bourgeois. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Timothée Bourgeois based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Timothée Bourgeois. Timothée Bourgeois is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Timothée Bourgeois
5 papers receiving 155 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Timothée Bourgeois
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timothée Bourgeois. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timothée Bourgeois. The network helps show where Timothée Bourgeois may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Timothée Bourgeois
This map shows the geographic impact of Timothée Bourgeois's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timothée Bourgeois with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timothée Bourgeois more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.