Timm Lampert

555 citations
25 papers · 346 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Timm Lampert

20 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers

Timm Lampert
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 47
  • Health 139
  • History and Philosophy of Science 21
  • Demography 52
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 44
Replace Philip B. Stafford with:
Philip B. Stafford United States
Fernando Torres-Gil United States
Kimberly J. Stoeckel Israel
Lucy Kervin Canada
David Nogueras United Kingdom
Juanita-Dawne Bacsu Canada
Laura Rubio Spain
Leen Heylen Belgium
Miranda Leontowitsch United Kingdom
Henrique Salmazo da Silva Brazil
Timm Lampert relative to Philip B. Stafford United States Philip B. Stafford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Philip B. Stafford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Timm Lampert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Timm Lampert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timm Lampert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timm Lampert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Timm Lampert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timm Lampert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timm Lampert. The network helps show where Timm Lampert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Timm Lampert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Timm Lampert Line = papers co-authored together Timm Lampert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002244
2 200720
3 200413
4 200512
5 20009
6 20077
7 20086
8 20105
9 20085
10 20204
11 20073
12 20173
13 20173
14
Ludwig Wittgensteins Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung Entstehungsgeschichte Und Herausgabe der Typoskripte Und Korrekturexemplare
20042
15 20162
16 20032
17 20172
18 20171
19 20041
20 20181

About Timm Lampert

Timm Lampert is a scholar working on Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Health Professions and Health, having authored 25 papers that have together received 346 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (11 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (6 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Global Health Care Issues (2 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Logic (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (47 citations), Health (139 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (21 citations), Demography (52 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (44 citations). Timm Lampert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ineke Maas, Michael Baumgärtner, Stephan Müters, Ulrike Maschewsky-Schneider, Lars Eric Kroll, Elvira Mauz, Frank Jacobi, Enno Swart, Peter Ihle and Gerd Graßhoff. Their work appears in journals such as History and Philosophy of Logic, Erkenntnis, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Logic Journal of IGPL and Synthese.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact