Tim Mercer

456 citations
37 papers · 349 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Tim Mercer

33 papers receiving 346 citations

Peers

Tim Mercer
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Biomaterials 73
  • Materials Chemistry 132
  • Biomedical Engineering 112
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 77
  • Analytical Chemistry 22
Replace Ellen Biermans with:
Ellen Biermans Belgium
R. R. Juluri India
Ilhem F. Hakem United States
Myungchan Kang United States
Douglas J. Harris United States
M.C.F.L. Lara Brazil
Weinan Wang China
Jeffrey Bodycomb Japan
R. C. Carrillo-Torres Mexico
Shivani Suri India
Tim Mercer relative to Ellen Biermans Belgium Ellen Biermans's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Ellen Biermans · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Mercer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Mercer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Mercer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Mercer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Mercer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Mercer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Mercer. The network helps show where Tim Mercer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tim Mercer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Mercer Line = papers co-authored together Tim Mercer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199852
2 202043
3 202033
4 201032
5 199827
6 201622
7 201219
8 202016
9 202211
10 199611
11 201410
12 201510
13 20217
14 19987
15 20256
16 20225
17 19945
18 19985
19 19993
20 19963

About Tim Mercer

Tim Mercer is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Condensed Matter Physics and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 37 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (15 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (10 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (6 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (5 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (4 papers), Iron oxide chemistry and applications (4 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (3 papers) and Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (73 citations), Materials Chemistry (132 citations), Biomedical Engineering (112 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (77 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (22 citations). Tim Mercer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Romania. Frequent co-authors include Tapas Sen, Pehr E. Pehrsson, P.R. Bissell, N. J. DiNardo, Ian J. Bruce, Michael P. Siegal, L. J. Martı́nez-Miranda, Thomas A. Friedmann, Subrayal M. Reddy and J. Rothman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Journal of Applied Physics, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Nanotechnology and Chemical Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact