Thomas Zobel

867 total citations
21 papers, 651 citations indexed

About

Thomas Zobel is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Marketing and Building and Construction. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Zobel has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 651 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Strategy and Management, 9 papers in Marketing and 8 papers in Building and Construction. Recurrent topics in Thomas Zobel's work include Sustainable Supply Chain Management (10 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (8 papers) and Quality and Management Systems (4 papers). Thomas Zobel is often cited by papers focused on Sustainable Supply Chain Management (10 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (8 papers) and Quality and Management Systems (4 papers). Thomas Zobel collaborates with scholars based in Sweden and Italy. Thomas Zobel's co-authors include Helena Ranängen, Ida Gremyr, Rickard Garvare, Raine Isaksson, Bjarne Bergquist, Anne‐Marie Tillman, Henrikke Baumann, Daniel Böckin and Cecilia Mark‐Herbert and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Cleaner Production and Business Strategy and the Environment.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Zobel

20 papers receiving 610 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Zobel Sweden 14 444 316 137 126 50 21 651
Dimitar Zvezdov Germany 12 547 1.2× 421 1.3× 60 0.4× 139 1.1× 54 1.1× 26 772
Morgane M.C. Fritz France 15 489 1.1× 241 0.8× 89 0.6× 130 1.0× 27 0.5× 27 727
Christine Jasch Austria 10 532 1.2× 397 1.3× 134 1.0× 104 0.8× 100 2.0× 23 862
Martin Charter United Kingdom 10 402 0.9× 263 0.8× 59 0.4× 49 0.4× 71 1.4× 26 657
Anastasiia Moldavska Norway 8 301 0.7× 126 0.4× 99 0.7× 85 0.7× 52 1.0× 9 487
Uálison Rébula de Oliveira Brazil 12 496 1.1× 183 0.6× 55 0.4× 218 1.7× 23 0.5× 55 771
Anna Bella Siriban‐Manalang United States 5 312 0.7× 231 0.7× 42 0.3× 93 0.7× 62 1.2× 9 484
Suresh Muthulingam United States 12 365 0.8× 219 0.7× 115 0.8× 140 1.1× 24 0.5× 25 654
Ruth Hillary United Kingdom 10 598 1.3× 571 1.8× 129 0.9× 66 0.5× 107 2.1× 17 836
Muhammad Waqas China 14 417 0.9× 223 0.7× 94 0.7× 161 1.3× 30 0.6× 23 736

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Zobel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Zobel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Zobel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Zobel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Zobel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Zobel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Zobel. The network helps show where Thomas Zobel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Zobel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Zobel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Zobel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Zobel. Thomas Zobel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Böckin, Daniel, et al.. (2022). Business model life cycle assessment: A method for analysing the environmental performance of business. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 32. 112–124. 30 indexed citations
2.
Böckin, Daniel, et al.. (2022). Towards sustainable business models with a novel life cycle assessment method. Business Strategy and the Environment. 31(5). 2019–2035. 36 indexed citations
3.
Zobel, Thomas, et al.. (2022). Use‐oriented business model. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 30(3). 1314–1324. 14 indexed citations
4.
Baumann, Henrikke, et al.. (2022). Switching the focus from product function to business profit: Introducing Business Model LCA (BM-LCA). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 349. 6004–6004. 3 indexed citations
5.
Böckin, Daniel, et al.. (2020). Environmental assessment of two business models - a life cycle comparison between a sales and a rental business model in the apparel sector in Sweden. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology). 2 indexed citations
6.
Zobel, Thomas, et al.. (2016). Evaluating the Management System Approach for Industrial Energy Efficiency Improvements. Energies. 9(10). 774–774. 21 indexed citations
7.
Gremyr, Ida, et al.. (2016). The support of Quality Management to sustainable development: a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 138. 148–157. 218 indexed citations
8.
Zobel, Thomas. (2015). ISO 14001 adoption and industrial waste generation: The case of Swedish manufacturing firms. Waste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy. 33(2). 107–113. 15 indexed citations
9.
Zobel, Thomas. (2015). The impact of ISO 14001 on corporate environmental performance: a study of Swedish manufacturing firms. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 59(4). 587–606. 35 indexed citations
10.
Ranängen, Helena & Thomas Zobel. (2014). Revisiting the ‘how’ of corporate social responsibility in extractive industries and forestry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 84. 299–312. 69 indexed citations
11.
Ranängen, Helena, et al.. (2014). The merits of ISO 26000 for CSR development in the mining industry: a case study in the Zambian Copperbelt. Social Responsibility Journal. 10(3). 500–515. 16 indexed citations
12.
Zobel, Thomas, et al.. (2014). The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) in Uganda: Who will take the lead when the government falters?. The Extractive Industries and Society. 2(1). 33–45. 24 indexed citations
13.
Ranängen, Helena & Thomas Zobel. (2014). Exploring the path from management systems to stakeholder management in the Swedish mining industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 84. 128–141. 22 indexed citations
14.
Zobel, Thomas. (2012). ISO 14001 certification in manufacturing firms: a tool for those in need or an indication of greenness?. Journal of Cleaner Production. 43. 37–44. 77 indexed citations
15.
Zobel, Thomas. (2012). The influence of ISO 14001 certification on industrial waste generation: the case of Swedish manufacturing firms. 1 indexed citations
16.
Ranängen, Helena & Thomas Zobel. (2011). Exploring the practical implementation of corporate social responsibility in the mining industry. 3 indexed citations
17.
Zobel, Thomas. (2006). The ‘pros’ and ‘cons’ of joint EMS and group certification: a Swedish case study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 14(3). 152–166. 24 indexed citations
18.
Zobel, Thomas. (2006). Characterisation of environmental policy implementation in an EMS context: a multiple-case study in Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production. 16(1). 37–50. 29 indexed citations
19.
Zobel, Thomas, et al.. (2003). Environmental effects of EMS : evaluation of the evidence. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 354–365. 8 indexed citations
20.
Zobel, Thomas. (2001). Environmental policy deployment in an environmental management system context : experiences from Swedish organizations. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026