Thomas Wirth

8.2k citations
178 papers · 6.3k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 44

Thomas Wirth

166 papers receiving 6.2k citations

Hit Papers

A lymphoid-specific protein binding to the octamer motif ...6671986202619992012200400600

Peers

Thomas Wirth
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Immunology 2.1k
  • Oncology 1.6k
  • Cancer Research 741
  • Genetics 1.1k
  • Molecular Biology 2.5k
Replace Eugenie S. Kleinerman with:
Eugenie S. Kleinerman United States
Ashley R. Dunn Australia
Christoph Huber Germany
Gerhard Moldenhauer Germany
Anna Mondino Italy
David W. Scott United States
Arinobu Tojo Japan
Mirella Giovarelli Italy
Robert G. Oshima United States
Thomas Wirth relative to Eugenie S. Kleinerman United States Eugenie S. Kleinerman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Eugenie S. Kleinerman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Wirth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Wirth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Wirth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Wirth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Wirth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Wirth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Wirth. The network helps show where Thomas Wirth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Wirth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Wirth Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Wirth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20253
2 20241
3 202318
4 20220
5 20222
6 20228
7 201952
8 201755
9 201732
10 2010169
11 2010212
12 200913
13 200910
14 2001101
15 19967
16 199429
17 199258
18
Prognose des Erfolges von Operationen and der Bandscheibe. Eine Untersuchung an Patienten mit Schmerzen nach einem lumbalen Bandscheibenvorfall
19916
19 199112
20 19918

About Thomas Wirth

Thomas Wirth is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Immunology, Developmental Biology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Oncology, having authored 178 papers that have together received 6.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (24 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (23 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (22 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (21 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (21 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (20 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (15 papers) and CAR-T cell therapy research (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (2.1k citations), Oncology (1.6k citations), Cancer Research (741 citations), Genetics (1.1k citations) and Molecular Biology (2.5k citations). Thomas Wirth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include David Baltimore, Louis M. Staudt, Stefan Zwilling, Florian Kühnel, Ranjan Sen, Phillip A. Sharp, Harinder Singh, Michael P. Manns, Harald König and Stefan Kubicka. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Cancer Research, Blood and Molecular Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026