Thomas Voß

757 total citations
10 papers, 193 citations indexed

About

Thomas Voß is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Voß has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 193 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 2 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 1 paper in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Thomas Voß's work include Economic and Social Issues (2 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (1 paper) and Consumer behavior in food and health (1 paper). Thomas Voß is often cited by papers focused on Economic and Social Issues (2 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (1 paper) and Consumer behavior in food and health (1 paper). Thomas Voß collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Netherlands. Thomas Voß's co-authors include Peter Preisendörfer, Werner Raub, Andreas Diekmann, Ivar Krumpal, Jeroen Weesie, Rainer Hegselmann, Andreas Tutić, Ulf Liebe and Norman Braun and has published in prestigious journals such as Organization Studies, Rationality and Society and SAGE Open.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Voß

9 papers receiving 160 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas Voß Germany	6	74	71	53	51	37	10	193
Laure Turner France	5	40 0.5×	87 1.2×	30 0.6×	24 0.5×	31 0.8×	8	190
Mona Said Egypt	7	35 0.5×	74 1.0×	39 0.7×	35 0.7×	15 0.4×	19	160
Dwijendra Tripathi India	7	26 0.4×	96 1.4×	27 0.5×	77 1.5×	17 0.5×	19	189
Daniela Federici Italy	10	20 0.3×	160 2.3×	31 0.6×	48 0.9×	28 0.8×	30	236
Mikael Stenkula Sweden	10	82 1.1×	149 2.1×	110 2.1×	31 0.6×	22 0.6×	35	263
Steven F. Kreft United States	4	105 1.4×	168 2.4×	72 1.4×	80 1.6×	18 0.5×	4	280
D. Gordon Smith United States	10	37 0.5×	70 1.0×	205 3.9×	11 0.2×	99 2.7×	31	307
Rita K. Almeida United States	10	21 0.3×	167 2.4×	16 0.3×	56 1.1×	21 0.6×	28	236
Balázs Páger Hungary	6	109 1.5×	76 1.1×	26 0.5×	31 0.6×	40 1.1×	27	241
Sara Depedri Italy	7	41 0.6×	19 0.3×	11 0.2×	54 1.1×	60 1.6×	15	154

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Voß

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Voß's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Voß with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Voß more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Voß

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Voß. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Voß. The network helps show where Thomas Voß may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Voß

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Voß. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Voß based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Voß. Thomas Voß is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Krumpal, Ivar & Thomas Voß. (2020). Sensitive Questions and Trust: Explaining Respondents’ Behavior in Randomized Response Surveys. SAGE Open. 10(3). 12 indexed citations

2.

Tutić, Andreas, Thomas Voß, & Ulf Liebe. (2017). Low-Cost-Hypothese und Rationalität. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. 69(4). 651–672. 3 indexed citations

3.

Braun, Norman & Thomas Voß. (2013). Zur Aktualität von James Coleman. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).

4.

Diekmann, Andreas & Thomas Voß. (2003). Rational-Choice-Theorie in den Sozialwissenschaften. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 20 indexed citations

5.

Raub, Werner, Thomas Voß, & Jeroen Weesie. (1992). On the Usefulness of Game Theory for the Resolution of Real-World Collective Action Problems. Rationality and Society. 4(1). 95–102. 3 indexed citations

6.

Preisendörfer, Peter & Thomas Voß. (1990). Organizational Mortality of Small Firms: The Effects of Entrepreneurial Age and Human Capital. Organization Studies. 11(1). 107–129. 119 indexed citations

7.

Hegselmann, Rainer, Werner Raub, & Thomas Voß. (1986). Zur Entstehung der Moral aus natürlichen Neigungen. Analyse & Kritik. 8(2). 150–177. 3 indexed citations

8.

Raub, Werner & Thomas Voß. (1986). Die Sozialstruktur der Kooperation rationaler Egoisten. Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 15(5). 309–323. 12 indexed citations

9.

Voß, Thomas. (1985). Rationale Akteure und soziale Institutionen. 15 indexed citations

10.

Raub, Werner & Thomas Voß. (1981). Individuelles Handeln und gesellschaftliche Folgen : das individualistische Programm in den Sozialwissenschaften. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact